kraftiekortie wrote:
If you fake it, people see right through you.
There’s a fine line between adapting to your environment and faking it.
The latter's a route I actively avoid in life, because my main goal's the former.
I'm no optimist, yet I seriously considered myself lucky. My environment and experiences dictates positive stuff, yet in nature I'm not.
And no, (OP), you're not cracking the NTs overall, not even close.
For NTs of your topic is but with another type and has specific ingredients of what makes a human colored or flavored that seems 'less dull, more authentic and successful' than autistics as you seem to claim or at least from your point of view. Some posters are already hints of these.
I suggest make it less specific; try knowing
allistics in general first -- this is even less specific, before putting NTs in general into a microscope and play them around in inheritance, cultures, circumstance and environments. Don't focus so much on NTs with flaws that don't hold them back, they don't reflect the whole picture of what makes an NT.
You can skip the 'human' before 'allistic', but don't skip 'allistic' before NT, definitely don't skip whole NTs before the 'better' or 'worse' NTs. This seems to be a common mistake of attempts of 'cracking NTs', but it is not without reason.
Especially about theory of mind and emotions; these are not NT-exclusive, nor is exclusive to those without alexithymia.
Main reason why I accept this to anyone who does, it's simply because it's their own way and I have mine. Who am I to change another when it works for them, or that is it's their route of choice?
I'm also not your stereotypical alexithymic, logic and verbally oriented, 'awkward/overly formal' nerd-like aspie either. I'm don't even mask or have masking for a social work around. I don't have the 'dull' stuff, I have the 'chaotic' stuff that my past accomplishments and failures became meaningless, and will likely never reflect my future.