What is wrong with the way autistic people communicate?
DuckHairback
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2021
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,484
Location: Durotriges Territory
I don't get that at all.
I like to:
Say what I mean. Mean what I say. Then move onto more interesting stuff. Instead of faffing around wondering what on earth people are woffling on about.
How does this work with your job KitLily? In fiction there's a 'show don't tell' rule isn't there? You must be able to process subtext and inference in writing? Is it more in verbal communication that it causes an issue?
That's how it is for me, I will sometimes be thinking about a conversation later in the day and I'll realise that I was being insulted perhaps, or complimented or something and I just didn't pick up on it. But in writing I don't think I have much of a problem because I can process it at my own speed.
_________________
I don't know, man. I just don't know.
I'm just trying to demonstrate the difference between meaning and communication. The words don't mean what I wrote, obviously, I just made that up. But in the context I imagined they can communicate all that weird extra stuff and the exact same words, in the exact same order can communicate a whole load of other weird stuff in countless different contexts.
I find that amazing. That's all.
Thanks for explaining.
I just find it annoying. If someone said Dave was in the break room when I came in this morning. I'd just think, oh, okay then. And move on to something more interesting.
_________________
That alien woman. On Earth to observe and wonder about homo sapiens.
Same here April. I share information that I think people might find interesting or informative.
_________________
That alien woman. On Earth to observe and wonder about homo sapiens.
I've never really thought about it before so I mustn't have any issues in that department.
My trouble is that I'm quite a quick thinker and I tend to predict what people are gonna say to me before they've said it. I think I'm busy reading body language quite a lot. I'm probably not autistic though.
_________________
we have existence
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with the way we communicate. I think it’s more that we speak a “different language” that most people don’t like/and or don’t understand.
_________________
I study and read. I bet I have read everything you've read. I consume entire libraries. I say things like, "The library, and step on it!"
- David Foster Wallace
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
That could be it, yes.
_________________
I study and read. I bet I have read everything you've read. I consume entire libraries. I say things like, "The library, and step on it!"
- David Foster Wallace
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
CockneyRebel
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 121,622
Location: In my own little country
DuckHairback
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2021
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,484
Location: Durotriges Territory
Is this not literally a rhetorical question?
No need to answer that btw
Maybe we should have a subtext marker, like the off-topic one? The subtext to this post being: Perhaps (some) autistic people use non-literal communication more than they think they do.
_________________
I don't know, man. I just don't know.
No need to answer that btw
Maybe we should have a subtext marker, like the off-topic one? The subtext to this post being: Perhaps (some) autistic people use non-literal communication more than they think they do.
Sorry, DHB, I was trying to present, in staged installments, my concept of the way we communicate. This stems from a comment my former supervisor made at my retirement luncheon: "He speaks a different language". Then he used the three statements I posted to relate his observations.
• I tend to use complete sentences without superlatives or emotional content.
• I usually do not recognize rhetorical question, innuendos, or subtext.
• I often do not take into account any cultural references or any context other than the immediate one.
Also . . .
• I ask questions to get to the "heart" of the topic under conversation, and some of those questions seem to have little or nothing to do with what the other person is trying to tell me; but if they just answer the question I ask (instead of the one they want me to ask), I can find out what is really going on and provide a solution to their problem.
• I tend to be literal, so (for example) if I ask how many people were present at a meeting, I am asking for a number, not a roll-call.
All of this seems to be relatable by many on the ASD spectrum, especially those who would have once been diagnosed as "Aspies".
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
DuckHairback
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jan 2021
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,484
Location: Durotriges Territory
• I tend to use complete sentences without superlatives or emotional content.
• I usually do not recognize rhetorical question, innuendos, or subtext.
• I often do not take into account any cultural references or any context other than the immediate one.
No need to apologise to me Fnord, I understood what you were getting at and I appreciate anyone who wants to engage with the discussion. I actually prefer your bulleted recap here because you use tend to/usually/often which seems more accurate to me, and that was part of what I was getting at.
I've read a lot of ASD/Aspies on WP and I see plenty of insinuation, inference and allusion. Maybe not as much as NTs, I can't quantify it, but many ASD people do use these skills very competently, and probably without realising they're doing it a lot of the time.
_________________
I don't know, man. I just don't know.
That's how it is for me, I will sometimes be thinking about a conversation later in the day and I'll realise that I was being insulted perhaps, or complimented or something and I just didn't pick up on it. But in writing I don't think I have much of a problem because I can process it at my own speed.
Oh yes, I usually get it in writing, I'm far more switched on to written communication. I can usually tell what's going to happen in stories. And also the stories I edit aren't usually very complicated, they are usually romance and erotica, they aren't very deep and meaningful. Boy meets girl/ boy meets boy, they have a few problems, then live happily ever after. I doubt if I'd be any good at editing authors like James Joyce.
It's verbal communication that foxes me. I'm pretty disabled when it comes to listening, hearing, understanding verbal communication e.g. if someone gives me verbal directions I can't take it in, but draw me a map! I can read it easily. Rarely get lost with a map.
I do the same as you with conversations, it often takes me hours/ days/ weeks/ months/ years to realise what happened and who said what to whom.
_________________
That alien woman. On Earth to observe and wonder about homo sapiens.
I used to not include qualifiers like "seems to", "may be", and "likely" in my conversations. Then I found out that "telling it like it is" makes many people uncomfortable.
"She seems to have been depressed" is somehow more acceptable than "She was depressed". I do not know why, even though the alleged reasons have been explained to me repeatedly.
Or maybe I do understand their explanations; but I just do not accept those explanations as valid.

_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
• I usually do not recognize rhetorical question, innuendos, or subtext.
• I often do not take into account any cultural references or any context other than the immediate one.
Also . . .
• I ask questions to get to the "heart" of the topic under conversation, and some of those questions seem to have little or nothing to do with what the other person is trying to tell me; but if they just answer the question I ask (instead of the one they want me to ask), I can find out what is really going on and provide a solution to their problem.
• I tend to be literal, so (for example) if I ask how many people were present at a meeting, I am asking for a number, not a roll-call.
All of this seems to be relatable by many on the ASD spectrum, especially those who would have once been diagnosed as "Aspies".[/color]
I can definitely relate to this.
_________________
That alien woman. On Earth to observe and wonder about homo sapiens.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Autistic people, would you prefer to have no developmental o |
07 Aug 2026, 7:34 am |
| Hello Wrong Planet! |
03 Jul 2026, 1:53 pm |
| wrong planet is back! |
07 Aug 2026, 6:54 pm |
| Is it wrong to talk about personal issues at work? |
08 Aug 2026, 3:25 pm |
