Page 3 of 3 [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

22 Nov 2007, 10:01 am

jjstar wrote:
Behind every belief, thought, idea, concept, judgment, defense there is YOU. YOU, brought into this world as a soul, brilliant and beautiful with knowledge, wisdom and understanding and who received conditioning (aka parenting or *education*) that caused the knowing (aka your Truth) to be disguised. It's there. It's never left. It's just been given some heavy duty camafloging and masking with stuff like fears, denial and projection that really, really makes it hard to hear the Truth you know. I know this because it's relative to every single human being on the planet - no exception except maybe saints. They've gotten clear or were brought here to show the Truth to others so that they may recognize it in themselves and wake up. I think really we're all right in the middle of doing just that and peeling away the layers of a lifetime of conditioning and unlearning what is so foreign to our True natures.

So this is actually a kind of religion, with an eternal spirit/soul to be found if pray hard enough/do enough "work".
I've stopped looking for paradise lost. Believing that i could retrieve it, that it had ever existed in this reality, at birth, and could be returned to , made me very miserable. I was just beating myself up permanently cos i was still experiencing " negative" feelings ( well, what they call neg), for which I apparently had no one to blame but myself.
My touchstone/key phrase is out of the film "The Princess Bride";
" Life IS pain, anyone who tells you different is selling something".
In Zen somewhere they say that avoiding/banishing negative feelings/thoughts is like always turning right; you go round in a circle.
I don't believe that I was born with an eternal spirit. I just don't. I believe that if there is anything that could be called "me" it is a shifting mass of loosely associated habits, reactions, etc etc. My "self" is an illusion/mirage. There is NOTHING there. I love thinking that!! !!

( it reminds me of the robin hood plumber in "Brazil", who disappears in the windblown newspaper, and of the invisible man; take off the bandages and.... "nothing", just the visual aspect of it, and what's that other one someone frantically unpacking and unpacking and unpacking, to find nothing in the middle!! :lol: .)
8)



Last edited by ouinon on 22 Nov 2007, 10:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

jjstar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,627

22 Nov 2007, 10:44 am

I like theories too because they keep me distracted so my mind is occupied with mental strategies - just so long as I don't have to feel.

nominalist wrote:
jjstar wrote:
Mark, what gets us in trouble (in Aspie-dom) is keeping things in theory and thought. Major trouble area for us. We can go round and round and up and down and never go through these matters to the crux.


I do like theory. (I am a social theorist.) However, I am also a neopragmatist. That is to say, I regard truth as that which works in particular contexts. For that reason, I like a constructivist modality called coherence therapy:

http://www.psychresources.net/

My concern is with separating truth claims from particular individual and social contexts.

Quote:
I think this terrifies us to even consider taking it from relativity and speculation into an unknown realm of practice.


Well, for a few years, I attended quarterly seminars in Parker Palmer's Formation:

http://www.league.org/league/projects/formation/about.htm

I had some disagreements with it (like the time we were asked to listen to a rock, twig, etc.), but overall I felt as though it was beneficial.

Quote:
This is why in the finding solutions, truth must be sought via work. Plain and simple - from the drawing board out there to the multi-layered psyche that resides within. Metaphysics no longer applies to the new paradigm of Truth. Theory is now replaced with reality in all of its guises. Acceptance takes forefront placement leaving conflict behind.


To me, that implies that reality exists. I do not personally agree with that idea. IMO, reality or truth is simply a name for socially constructed knowledge.

I was not always a nominalist, and I realize that my views are now in the minority (almost everywhere). However, nominalism and poststructuralism are how I understand my experiences. I appreciate, and respect, that your perspective is different, but I can't accept a paradigm for what I believe is merely an abstraction (truth).


_________________
Natives who beat drums to drive off evil spirits are objects of scorn to smart Americans who blow horns to break up traffic jams. ~Mary Ellen Kelly


jjstar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,627

22 Nov 2007, 10:46 am

Behind the pain is a soul. You can call you - whatever you wish. I just like to call it soul.


ouinon wrote:
jjstar wrote:
Behind every belief, thought, idea, concept, judgment, defense there is YOU. YOU, brought into this world as a soul, brilliant and beautiful with knowledge, wisdom and understanding and who received conditioning (aka parenting or *education*) that caused the knowing (aka your Truth) to be disguised. It's there. It's never left. It's just been given some heavy duty camafloging and masking with stuff like fears, denial and projection that really, really makes it hard to hear the Truth you know. I know this because it's relative to every single human being on the planet - no exception except maybe saints. They've gotten clear or were brought here to show the Truth to others so that they may recognize it in themselves and wake up. I think really we're all right in the middle of doing just that and peeling away the layers of a lifetime of conditioning and unlearning what is so foreign to our True natures.

So this is actually a kind of religion, with an eternal spirit/soul to be found if pray hard enough/do enough "work".
I've stopped looking for paradise lost. Believing that i could retrieve it, that it had ever existed in this reality, at birth, and could be returned to , made me very miserable. I was just beating myself up permanently cos i was still experiencing " negative" feelings ( well, what they call neg), for which I apparently had no one to blame but myself.
My touchstone/key phrase is out of the film "The Princess Bride";
" Life IS pain, anyone who tells you different is selling something".
In Zen somewhere they say that avoiding/banishing negative feelings/thoughts is like always turning right; you go round in a circle.
I don't believe that I was born with an eternal spirit. I just don't. I believe that if there is anything that could be called "me" it is a shifting mass of loosely associated habits, reactions, etc etc. My "self" is an illusion/mirage. There is nothing there. I love thinking that!! !!

( it reminds me of the robin hood plumber in "Brazil", who disappears in the windblown newspaper, and of the invisible man; take off the bandages and.... "nothing", just the visual aspect of it, and what's that other one someone frantically unpacking and unpacking and unpacking, to find nothing in the middle!! :lol: .)
8)


_________________
Natives who beat drums to drive off evil spirits are objects of scorn to smart Americans who blow horns to break up traffic jams. ~Mary Ellen Kelly


nominalist
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,740
Location: Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (born in NYC)

22 Nov 2007, 10:57 am

jjstar wrote:
I like theories too because they keep me distracted so my mind is occupied with mental strategies - just so long as I don't have to feel.


I use social theory because I am a social scientist. Theories are at the bases of all sciences. One begins by deducing hypotheses from a theory. One ends by inductively testing those hypotheses to see if they support the theory. The circle begins with theory and ends with theory.

What is a distraction to one person can be a passion to the next. I would suggest that Byron Katie's approach is also a theory (of sorts), albeit a highly ideational one.


_________________
Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. (retired tenured sociology professor)
36 domains/24 books: http://www.markfoster.net
Emancipated Autism: http://www.neurelitism.com
Institute for Dialectical metaRealism: http://dmr.institute