NewportBeachDude wrote:
Age1600, my wife and I watched a PBS docu called "The Thinking Man" about a high-fucntioning Asperger man at age 21 who was articulate and had savant traits. The problem we had is that even though he could communicate and was articulate, that's where the "functioning" part ended. He needed help with personal grooming. He was fired from two jobs while the documentary was being shot because he couldn't understand social rules, crossed boundaries at his job, made racists comments, and argued with a superior. Then he tried to live on his own, but after two weeks was back with his folks because he couldn't cope. His social behavior at his own bday party was like that of a 3 year old. They say this man is high-functioning Aspergers, but he will need someone to watch over him for the rest of his life and he's only 21.
To me, higher functioning should be without constant direction, intervention, supervision. If not, you're not really functioning as much as being assisted and aided. Since you say you need help with day to day things, need constant supervision in certain environments, have meltdows and problems feeding yourself, I don't think that's high-functioning at all. It's low to medium functioning, depending on the environment you're in from what you've posted. I don't know you personally, so I'm going by what you posted on this thread.
The whole notion of functioning means different things to everyone. I know parents who say they're kids are high-functioning, but the kids are nonverbal and 2-3 years behind in school. Then, I know others whose kids are high-functioning and they show little signs of Autism at all. Who knows?
Thanks for your reply, I def could pass for low functioning certian times, but most of the time its moderate-high functioning.
_________________
Being Normal Is Vastly Overrated
