Page 3 of 3 [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

astaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,777
Location: Southeast US

28 Jul 2011, 3:27 pm

I enjoy arguing just for the sake of it, but I won't keep at an argument if I can see that I'm really upsetting someone or something like that. But if I know I'm right or the other person just really isn't making any rational sense, it's hard for me to stop arguing.


_________________
After a time, you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing, after all, as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true.
--Spock


EmmaUK12
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 May 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,748
Location: England

28 Jul 2011, 3:35 pm

Irulan wrote:
Sure, I just HAVE to get the last word :twisted:

Same here!



SammichEater
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2011
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,903

28 Jul 2011, 3:38 pm

I don't think I've ever won an argument before. I suck at getting my point across, even though I know I'm right. Or maybe nobody listens to what I say. I don't know which it is.


_________________
Remember, all atrocities begin in a sensible place.


Buck-oh
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 80

28 Jul 2011, 5:55 pm

gramirez wrote:
Does anyone feel that no matter what, you simply have to win an argument or a debate? I get this a lot. Usually it's because I feel really strongly about something, or because the other person is so wrong, that they sound like an ignorant hypocrite.

Is this an A.S. intelligence thing?


No it's not an AS thing, and it's not an "intelligence" thing, it's a "defensiveness" thing. There are way too many NTs who feel the need to win every argument without backing down.

Here's an example of an NT who felt the need to win an argument, no matter what the cost. http://www.ajc.com/news/cobb/ex-mcdonal ... e=rss_news

There's a tactical advantage in walking away from arguments. It's called "picking your battles". For a lot of petty arguments, sometimes the winning strategy is not to play. Save your winning arguments for debates that really matter.


AmberEyes wrote:
I don't think that there is a single "truth" as such.
Different people have different views, hence there are many different "truths".
If it's possible to be able to try and unite these truths in some semi-coherent way then all to the good.


Exactly. Truth is, and will always be, subjective. Facts are objective, but open to misinterpretation. The key is in recognizing the difference between subjective and objective data.

If John has a headache, it's something only he can experience, so for John, "I have a headache" is a factual statement. If John tells Mary he has a headache, then if Mary believes John, "John has a headache" is a truthful (and subjective) statement, and "John told me he has a headache" is a factual (and objective) statement.

If John is lying about his headache, and Mary believes him, John is lying, but Mary is still telling the truth.



KinetiK
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jul 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 120

28 Jul 2011, 8:51 pm

If someone makes a comment against gay marriage or gays in general, I WILL get into an argument with them. Being against gay marriage or gay rights is, in my view, indefensible in this day and age, as it implies profound ignorance, lack of compassion, or both.

I will also make arguments for Roe v. Wade and marijuana legalization, but I can understand the other side concerning these issues, so I will be a lot more agreeable.



CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 118,415
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love

28 Jul 2011, 10:29 pm

I used to get that way due to the fact that I wanted to prove my intelligence to everybody in my life a couple of years ago. I'm not so much like that anymore. I'd rather be happy than right and I don't have anything to prove to anybody. I have better things to do than to prove myself.


_________________
The Family Enigma


zer0netgain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,615

29 Jul 2011, 7:06 am

Growing up, I was always excluded for any number of "not good enough" excuses. I became a perfectionist thinking if I did everything perfectly, people would like me.

It didn't help that a lot of people said I was wrong, even if (in fact) I was right. I developed this need to win all the time, be right all the time, I became a very annoying person over this. I've made progress getting over this compulsive need, but it still flares up time and again.



AbleBaker
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 212

29 Jul 2011, 9:46 am

simon_says wrote:
No, but I have to be factual. What people do with that is up to them. I'm not a psychiatrist.
This is my problem, too. I don't have to win the argument but I do have to be accurate. I'm always surprised that some people take it as a personal insult if you tell them they're wrong about something.