Noca wrote:
I was self diagnosed before I was professionally diagnosed. I don't think non professionals can diagnose others with any degree of absolute certainty but I think any reasonably intelligent person who has done enough research and thought long and hard enough can self diagnose, at least enough to say that they are on the spectrum or not, if not knowing exactly where they would fall on the spectrum specifically.
Society treats doctor's like all knowing gods for some reason, but given the internet, and enough research, many topics the patient can be just as informed as a doctor can on any one given topic or niche area, if not better in some cases.
This is true. I think of self-diagnosis as being a 'smoother' process specifically with regards to mental conditions. But, thinking about it, I've also self-diagnosed physical conditions in the past.
I have done my research before on physical things, gone in and told the doctor what I believe is wrong, had them confirm it and provide me with the required prescription. In one case, the doctor listened to me telling them what was wrong and then, in front of me, pulled a medical encyclopaedia from the shelf, looked up the condition and agreed with me. Obviously these are general doctors, and we would hope that the specialists have more in-depth knowledge, but the point is that the first point of contact is often a general doctor.
I took my 'why I believe I have autism' list to my GP. They're not qualified to assess me, but they needed me to be able to explain why I believed that I did. Otherwise, I'm wasting everyone's time. "Because I saw the word 'autism' and I want to get checked out for it" doesn't cut it.