WritersBlock wrote:
Let's be accurate, shall we? I called ONE person an "idiot". This isn't (in my book) "calling other people names". It's making a statement on another persons' judgment of my character based on opinion.
By the way- the mod in question is a person who refers to themselves as "lau" (whatever that means). As to who reported me- I couldn't care less.
One person who never called you a name. For the record though, it is calling someone a name, and when you tell someone they're an idiot for believing a source, you're essentially calling everyone who believes that source an idiot.
As for judgement - you are reading far too much into the statements; go back through all of his posts and find me one instance where he calls out a name or says you cannot be on the spectrum. You will not find one, because there is none. He responded to your post saying everyone was a liar by pointing out that he was not a liar (and he is not) and a few posts later that typically people on the autism spectrum do not naturally know how to lie, although some can learn. When you continued to refuse to change your opinion, he offered a source.
Now look at your posts. You respond by telling him to screw off, which is always a highly effective debate point. You somehow decided that he was saying that everyone on the spectrum was incapable of lying, thus making you off the spectrum, despite the fact that he never once said that. Then you called him an idiot. And somehow you cannot see where you are in the wrong? And now you will warn off someone who is attempting to make a reasonable argument for dishonesty - something you have not been able to do - because it's a "popularity" thing. Come now.
_________________
"Nothing worth having is easy."
Three years!