How do you tell if someone is a savant?

Page 4 of 5 [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

memesplice
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,072

28 Feb 2010, 10:31 am

Equiis ~It will be a great debate, but not here. I get the feeling it would be hijacking a thread, and this is a thread with interest of its own and needs to be allowed to develop.

Maybe you would like to start the physics-over-rationalization? theme as a thread?



PunkyKat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 May 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,492
Location: Kalahari Desert

28 Feb 2010, 11:47 am

Blindspot149 wrote:
PunkyKat wrote:
Spazzergasm wrote:
you're great!
yeah though. what is the threshold between talent and savantism?


A savant is a person who has an talent in one area (such as art, music or mathmatics) but otherwise is severely mentaly handicapped and could never function on their own.


Daniel Tammet is a savant in both languages and mathematics.

He is also a genius, with an IQ of 150.

He has Asperger's, lives completely independently and is self-made financially independent.


Wouldn't he just be considered a genius then?



Odin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,475
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA

28 Feb 2010, 5:06 pm

Callista wrote:
There'd be less symmetry in the stars than in the patterns made by the forces of gravity. And the less resolution you looked at it with, the more symmetry. So, maybe some pretty chaotic stuff on the small scale looking very orderly on the large scale. Fractal-ish. (Speaking of which, that prime pattern really reminds me of fractals...)

I always wondered why spiral galaxies have spiral arms, instead of just having a more-or-less gradually decreasing number of stars as you go out from the center. I bet it has something to do with small asymmetries.

As a kid, I always used to wonder what it would look like if the universe itself were rotating, instead of expanding, because of how everything else below that level seems to move in circular or elliptical patterns. Apparently, somebody else had gotten to it first, as there's a rotating-universe model out there already. And before I was born, too. *sigh* Why do they never leave some of the good problems for me?


The spirals are density waves, which compress gas and dust and pop out large, short-lived, bright blue stars.


_________________
My Blog: My Autistic Life


justMax
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Nov 2009
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 539

01 Mar 2010, 12:32 am

Btw, those dots weren't galaxy representations.

They're just what happens when you roll a number line up around an archimedean spiral.



EquiisSavant
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Female
Posts: 51

01 Mar 2010, 3:51 am

memesplice wrote:
Equiis ~It will be a great debate, but not here. I get the feeling it would be hijacking a thread, and this is a thread with interest of its own and needs to be allowed to develop.

Maybe you would like to start the physics-over-rationalization? theme as a thread?


I made a plain factual statement. Since you have attacked me, I am off of WP. I refuse to engage with others who attack me. Your loss - I am a savant by diagnosis.



memesplice
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,072

01 Mar 2010, 9:41 am

Equiis- That was an invitation to a constructive debate . Please place what you thought I meant within that context and reevaluate .



Spazzergasm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,415
Location: Maine

01 Mar 2010, 11:14 am

justMax wrote:
Btw, those dots weren't galaxy representations.

They're just what happens when you roll a number line up around an archimedean spiral.

Yeah, I know. :) But they look sort of like one don't they?



EquiisSavant
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Female
Posts: 51

10 Mar 2010, 7:01 pm

Spazzergasm wrote:
How can you tell for sure? I was interested about them, and found out there is an artistic savant type. I really don't want to sound full of myself or anything, I'm just genuinly curious. I don't have the ability to focus one one thing for too long, so I've never drawn or painted anything too elaborate. But I can if I want to, and I've always been the person everyone is constantly amazed at her artistic skills. I can draw very fast, and even at age 5 I was drawing better than some adults. I had really developed fine motor skills. (Isn't that an anti-aspie trait?) And I can draw from my mind very well, and get 3D and stuff.
But don't savants have to be DAMN good? Like virtually real looking. I really don't know. Hell, I don't even know if I have asperger's syndrome. :P


A prodigious Autistic savant can do many things - like invent the cartoon series: "Mary Pumpkin, The First Autistic."

Image

However, that doesn't mean I intend to get into a verbal engagement on this forum with some of the neurotypicals who are here masquerading as fake Autistic savants. And I certainly don't have any obligation to answer their interrogations by which they endeavor to assert school teacher-like control over the conversation.

I only talk to people who can accept my different neurotype as an Autistic Savant. I don't talk to people who want to find things wrong with who I am.



LuxoJr
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 391
Location: a dance party on the moon

11 Mar 2010, 1:18 am

I have a savant friend, so all basing my knowledge off experience:
A savant is a person with any exceptional ability in usually one or two (most often related) fields. Such as art or music or whatnot. My friend is a savant in art.
Now I have talent and he has savant ability. And I am greatly above him in social skills, but he is greatly above me in artistic skills. Of course like all artists we have both learned to see what is in front of us and be able to apply that into our art. We have both also been able to draw from our memory, although he is better at that since he has been doing art longer. But things he can do that I have not seen anyone else do is be able to emulate other people's art styles, draw absolutely anything he imagine without any sort of reference (including humans which is one of the most difficult subjects I believe in art). Another thing is he has a good memory. Like his favorite show is Family Guy, and he constantly recites dialogue using the same tones and voices as the actual lines of the characters in order to amuse me. He fails, but I still laugh :P. Another example is we watched a movie in class, and afterwards he was able to repeat a long monologue verbatim made by one of the characters. I think it's important to know that he only has to watch these things once in order to remember them.
But then for some reason he is terrible at remembering other things like deadlines. Then again, I am too.
So I could guess that what differentiates them from being only talented is that there is some disorder or deficiency they have that "balances" them out. So they're not entirely superhuman, but then still exceptional.

ie Michelangelo, daVinci, Isaac Newton, etc


_________________
We could sail on a pancake sail ship in an ocean of chocolate. And if it sinks we could hitch a ride on a ratatouille rocket.


unityemissions
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 69

11 Mar 2010, 2:05 pm

Savants are people with rewired brains. There's usually some sort of brain damage, and neuroplasticity takes over with the result being an exceptional skill at times. About 10% of hfa/aspergers have some sort of savant skill.

I'm a savant of sorts for certain types of games. I play merit megatouch games in the bar. Photohunt, photopop, and taiplay mostly. I'm a top scorer in the DFW area for Photohunt, though have seem much higher scores online. I only get 400k+. Photopop I've gotten to level 237 on the erotica version, with a score of like 11million and some change. Never seen anything remotely close to that. Taiplay I'm probably best in the state at 358,960. I've seen just one person on youtube that has scored higher.

I can definitely focus much more intensely than most anyone else I've met at things that interest me. Just the way I'm wired.

Here's me playing Tai-Play last year. When I watch the video, it really doesn't seem like much, but it's a bit different when you're in front of the screen.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JBsPyXf0Rs[/youtube]


_________________
Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day.
--Thomas Jefferson --


KoS
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 129

11 Mar 2010, 9:14 pm

Daniel Tammet is not a prodigious or autistic savant. He is an AQUIRED savant, he aqured his savant-like abilities though brain injury. Yes I know what wiki says *rolls eyes*, but see what he says for himself about it. It's the most common way for non-autistic people to become savants.

And just wondering when you guys talk about savants, do you mean Autstic-Savants or Prodigious Savants (savant syndrome)? Cause both are exceedingly rare.


_________________
2 LFA Brothers + 1 Aspie Sister


pumibel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Mar 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,477

11 Mar 2010, 9:40 pm

Omerik wrote:
I consider myself a linguistic savant, I think... I probably have a high IQ anyways, but while I'm just "good" at maths and not that special, at least in comparison to other "gifted" people, I always got languages immediately. Let's say I learnt English before studying in school, for example, just by watching TV shows with translation when I was about 8 years old, and then reading stuff and using a dictionary, with no tutor. Whenever I travel to a foreign country I also "absorb" linguistic information without trying.

People always tell me they're jealous of this, but it's practically useless, to say the truth...


Are you kidding? You can use this talent more than most people can use their talents. You can probably go anywhere and fit into the culture if you need to. If you wanted to travel it would be a perfect talent to have. Plus, by being a linguistic savant you have the advantage of knowing what words mean and how to spell them because you recognize the etymology . I think that is how these wiz kid spelling bee champs are able to spell the most obscure words in a competition.



pumibel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Mar 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,477

11 Mar 2010, 9:48 pm

Blindspot149 wrote:
I have read that we humans use perhaps only 10% of the capacity of our brains.

I think Savants give us a tiny glimpse of the true potential of the human mind.............and spirit



The kids on the PBs show "Fetch" proved that we actually use a lot more of the brain than 10%, probably more like 50-60%. They had a med student go into the MRI machine and read, solve math problems, solve puzzles, smell, taste, and touch, listen to music, etc. The areas of brain she used lit up on the MRI screen. It was a good portion of the brain- looked like more than half. and if you are wondering why I watch Ruff Ruffman, I do have a 10 year-old, LOL.



pumibel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Mar 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,477

11 Mar 2010, 10:11 pm

Blindspot149 wrote:
I think there may be a rather simple answer to this question.


2. Can they draw the ENTIRE cityscape of Rome (or any other large city) with almost total perfection after flying over it for a few hours and seeing the city for first time; like Stephen Wiltshire


This one actually floored me- I saw a show on the Internet about him. He could also draw other pieces, in perfect scale, of chosen section of the larger work zoomed in. It is like when you take a photo then zoom in and take a closeup of a small section of the same subject. He drew that giant panorama of Rome in perfect scale with a Sharpee (so no erasures), then made smaller drawings of sections of that same drawing of Rome, only zoomed in and still in perfect scale. This was completely from memory, as you stated. He is a wonder, to put it mildly!



unityemissions
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 69

13 Mar 2010, 1:33 am

KoS wrote:
Daniel Tammet is not a prodigious or autistic savant. He is an AQUIRED savant, he aqured his savant-like abilities though brain injury. Yes I know what wiki says *rolls eyes*, but see what he says for himself about it. It's the most common way for non-autistic people to become savants.

And just wondering when you guys talk about savants, do you mean Autstic-Savants or Prodigious Savants (savant syndrome)? Cause both are exceedingly rare.


You seem to be all sorts of confused. Their are different tiers of savant skills. The highest is prodigious. Daniel Tammet is considered a prodigious savant. It doesn't matter if the person is autistic or acquired it from brain injury, the main cause of savantism is a unique rewiring of the brain which enables low-level processing to become conscious. It's basically using our subconscious mind on a semi-aware level.

Autistic savants are not rare at all for someone on the spectrum. It's estimated that around 10% of high-functioning autistics have some sort of savant skill. Savants are not all too rare, and I would think they mostly go unrecognized in life. Prodigious savants are the incredibly rare ones.


_________________
Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day.
--Thomas Jefferson --


KoS
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 129

13 Mar 2010, 7:21 pm

I am definitely confused! I have grown up being taught one thing about savants which has been reinforced by everything I've seen/read/heard since, and now I come here, and apparently that 25 years of information was all wrong and EVERYONE and ANYONE who excels at anything is a savant...or erm...mild savant *cough*.

Seems like a bit of a reach, or really it sounds to me like a bunch of people want to be savants (it is kinda cool) and are stretching the truth and the reality of the definition/s to make it so they can be. But really, they're just very talented and learned at what ever it is they're doing. Savants aren't talented or learned or practiced, they just are. I read an article once that stated what makes a savant is "the absence of reason" as in, they shouldn't logically be able to know or do what they do....but they can. It is beyond understanding and no logical connection can be made between life experience and their abilities, it just is. There is no reason why or how, it just is, and that's what makes a savant a savant. (?????)

The fact that I live with my bro who is what most people would consider to be a typical old skool "idiot savant" type doesn't help the rigidity of my thinking in this area. It's not like any thing else, it's like a miracle, and that's not going overboard. It really is. I'm going to ask a few people who are more in the know about it to find out more.


_________________
2 LFA Brothers + 1 Aspie Sister