SabbraCadabra wrote:
I hear that word, evolution, all the time, but I don't understand how that can explain how a maple tree just randomly decides to grow funny looking seeds, just for the heck of it, without realizing the implications.
You are looking at it the wrong way around. We know what maple trees look like. We know how they grow. We know there are little twiddly things inside them that carry a template, of sorts, for their growth. You can look at them and see how they work. Even if you are a Creationist and believe God made the maple tree yesterday, or made it spring into being at some remote date, you cannot deny - without denying the evidence of your own eyes - that this is how maple trees grow.
You can also see that there are ways in which the little twiddly things can be changed by their environment, like radiation for instance. So you have a tree which grows based on a pattern held in the little twiddly things - a pattern which can and is changed every now and then. If those changes are bad, the tree that grows may be sick, or die; if they are neutral, it might change in some cosmetic way; if they are positive (which is rare) the tree will end up better. Again, only someone prepared to deny the evidence of their own eyes would claim that nature as it exists is perfect - look around

- or that there are ways in which things can be improved over their present forms. The question we are left with is not, how
can things evolve? but how can they
not?
Creationism is not actually incompatible with evolution - if you choose to believe the world was created a few thousand years ago on the strength of some geezer writing it in a book back in the Ignorant Ages, you can't actually be disproven - but attempting to argue that things do not evolve when the evidence is in every cell of every body of every living thing on the planet is to blind yourself to reality, which is a shame.
_________________
No one has gone missing or died.
The year is still young.