Going Into Excessive Detail

Post Reply New Topic

Blimey. That's my handwriting in a nutshell.
Provided that someone beats me to death to make me write by hand, that is.

I remember that when I was applying for a PhD position they had me read my written exam paper aloud to the examiners because none of them could decipher my writing. And mind, those were three doctors who have read illegibly written prescriptions and medical histories all their working lives.
So they had my 54 pages read out to them, poor things. True, I had them bored to death but also very impressed indeed.

Ents have always been my favourite type of magical creatures in Tolkien's works.

When I was writing my Doctor Who fanfic and my computer crashed (great timing) I had to write the rest by hand. My arm ached for days but because I was pumped up on my meds I couldn't stop writing. I ended up with the pencil smudging my right hand.

Wow, that is rotten timing. Good thing you were able to finish.

I don't know that I could hold out that long. Printing and handwriting hurts like hell.

There are so many posts in this thread that I can relate to, I'm not sure which to mention first.

I think I can both generalize and deal with details, but often when writing I will use tree-like structures to make sure that all of my details attach to more general concepts.

I think the main reason my language, both written and spoken, gives a lot of detail is that (like others have said here (even in embedded paretheses, which I like as well)) when dealing with a special interest, there are just so many background details I can't assume the general public will know.

Aside from that is an aspect I think closely related to Aspie honesty and literalness. I don't want to generalize without pointing out the exceptions and limitations of the point I'm making.

And I'm also a big fan of Ents.

I believe I have dysgraphia. Although I am left-handed and it was suggested to me all left-handed people have trouble with writing because it is ergonomically designed for right handed people, I suspect most left-handed people are not quite as illegible or experience quite as much pain. I somehow suspect it'd be kind of well known.

I would so hate reading a paper aloud.

I know a couple of left-handed people who have good handwriting. It is tilted to the left though.

The descriptive term is dysgraphia but I think it is more a symptom than anything else. I mean that it is related to having autism, ADHD, etc. and is rarely on its own. It is usually considered a manifestation of sequence and/or motorics problems that are part of the bigger picture.

I don't think that I'm hyperlexic, but I can understand what you are talking about. I've had the early advanced reading ability too. I also have a tendency to understand words in context, and sometimes get into trouble because they don't mean quite what I intend. I must admit that my examples aren't quite as extreme as yours.

I can be too wordy too. Though in a different way. Instead of starting with the details, I start with a brief description. Then I feel obligated to add qualifiers and explanations and details to make sure that I'm understood completely. I hate being misunderstood. I've mostly managed to break that habit, thankfully, but I will still fall into that trap once in a while.

Yeah, that sounds about right. I tried to find good thorough information on the topic online, but most of it was basic precis-level stuff for parents of children with dysgraphia. I am currently bitter about all the forms I've had to fill out for social security and DSHS (state services) with no alternatives (such as online forms I could type out) available.

I also never quite mastered tying my shoes. I got the basic principles down early on - and my mother insists that I was good at it - but my shoes were constantly too loose or too tight or came untied whenever I had to walk more than 10-15 feet. I think I was in my late 20s before I worked out I could do something to keep my shoes (or boots) from coming untied. Doesn't matter now, though, I'm all about the velcro.

Extreme?

I think I stopped using words contextually at some point in the 80s, where I think I've been pretty sure what most words I know mean, and know how to use define:word google searches if I think to.

I have one professionally published misused word that is at least somewhat close to what I was trying to say. It's still a bit of a blight on my mind.



Yeah, there are few things I hate as much as being misunderstood, or misread, or having people choose to read subtext into my text that isn't there.

This seems to work for me writing-wise, most of the time.

I was mostly thinking about this quote:



I don't think I ever did that.

Ah, right. I never did that...again.

The last time I tried to donate blood it failed because I couldn't fill out the form right. I got stuck at ' Do you practice currently or have you ever practiced a profession which may increase your risk of blood-transmitted diseases?' I know full well that this is an indirect question of whether you practice sex (possibly unsafe) with multiple partners (prostitution, etc.) or whether you are a tattooist, etc.
But when I thought about it - oh yes, I have handled blood samples from hundreds of people, the bulk of which were at risk of blood-transmitted diseases simply because of the fact they they had regular blood and plasma transfusions. Therefore it is quite a high-risk profession.
I tried to explain this to the nurse who had to collect the questionnaires but she simply looked suspicious and said 'Well you don't seem to fulfill the 110 pounds requirement anyway so you'd better go'.
So she invented a reason so as not to think for about 5 seconds but in the end it was me who looked stupid, or mad, or whatever.