Benjamin2006 wrote:
I have to say I'm confused by some of this particularly the issue of speech delay. Here's a comment from one of Tony Attwoods's papers
"Three studies have cast considerable
doubt over the use of early language delay as a differential criterion between autism and
Asperger's syndrome (Eisenmajer, Prior, Leekam, Wing, Ong, Gould and Welham 1998,
Dickerson Mayes and Calhoun 2001 Manjiviona and Prior 1999). Any differences in
language ability that are apparent in the pre-school years between children with autism
and Asperger's syndrome has largely disappeared by early adolescence (Eisenmajer,
Prior, Leekam, Wing, Ong, Gould and Welham 1998, Ozonoff, South and Miller 2000)."
I'm interested because my son is down to be assessed for being on the spectrum....and he had slight speech delay, he was a late talker.
But then again that's the whole problem with the label aspect....does it matter? You are looking at an individual and surely each person's position stands on it's own merits in terms of the issues they face.
That's the problem with a disorder that is a spectrum...in terms of assessments what happens to those on the border line of passing/failing a diagnostic test?
If they remain with issues despite not being diagnosed as being on the spectrum...does it matter? I know in some countries health care is an issue but I hope you get my main drift.
I've often wondered if anyone could actually be described as being on the spectrum despite the fact they might be very good socially as surely there are people who have very strong and consistent AS traits yet can function " normally" in social terms?
I find these types of discussions very confusing both in terms of the historical/factual basis and in a wider sense as to the complexities of a disorder versus the average set of problems any person faces growing up be it personality quirks, relationship and social issues.
I understand fully that certain people with an ASD have really defined and prominent issues but what about those veering towards or very very close to NT behaviours?
Pretty soon they'll all be merged so this issue will soon be moot. If you have a child currently being assessed I can see where the questions come from.
I agree 100% that the actual diagnosis doesn't matter that much. It's the individual challenges the person faces that needs to be addressed. Any diagnosis serves only to match patients with treatments. Comparing Autism with Asperger's the treatment is going to be effectively the same. (If we're talking about misdiagnosis with something like schizophrenia then the diagnosis becomes more important but there is still only a limited amount of treatment options out there and most of it is done by trial and error... As long as the psych profession relies on subjective testing involving self disclosure it will remain an imprecise science...) ...Where was I?
I would suggest that people on the spectrum who "veer toward" NT behaviour don't have ASD but instead have the style. Autistic Spectrum Disorder implies a certain level of impairment. If one isn't really impaired I can't say they are disordered. If one is impaired from living life the way they would like to live it then they are disordered. There may be better ways of saying this.
_________________
Why oh why didn't I take the BLUE pill? -Cypher, Matrix