dianthus wrote:
I was very, very good at math but my grades didn't always reflect that. A lot of the time I was able to solve problems in my head without having to do the work on paper but teachers expected us to "show our work". So if I put down the correct answer without showing them exactly how I got it, they would take points off on my grade even though I got the correct answer.
I found it really tedious and annoying to write down how I got the answer. Sometimes I just "knew" the answer to a problem and didn't have to do any work in my head at all. It was like the answer just came out of nowhere. So to be able to show my work I'd have to reverse engineer the answer back to the problem and sometimes along the way I'd get confused somewhere. So I'd put down the correct answer but the way I showed my work on the problem wouldn't be right so they'd still take points off.
And the biggest problem with showing my work on paper, is I would inevitably copy down some part of the problem wrong. I might reverse a couple of digits here or there, or just plain copy it down wrong in some way that didn't even make sense. In a lot of those cases I would do the "work" of the problem exactly like you were supposed to, but I'd get the wrong answer because of some stupid error I made copying the problem down.
So I guess in a way I was too good at math.
Seconded, though writing stuff down is important for longer problems with random factors scattered all over the place that you have to keep track of.