Guineapigged wrote:
I think it's horrible that people are saying they'd rather die than not have Asperger's. That's just as bad as somebody saying that they'd rather die than have AS (which would probably cause an uproar around here).
However, I do agree that this late in life it would be difficult to change. Once you've been this way for so long it is the norm; it is more comfortable than the alternative. If the question was, more specifically, "Would you rather have been born without AS?", I think more people would say yes.
You're raising an excellent point. Much of how we each answer this question, depends on how we interpret what it means to "become an NT". Why the very phrasing of that questoin "If you could become NT... etc." is an indication of the attitude of the person who originally asked it. I would have phrased the question differently.
Furthermore, we each of us have different ideas of what becoming "neurotypical" would mean. For me, personally, I would prefer to say "If I could lose my autism", and I'd interpret it as no longer having trouble with reading social cues, not feeling so hesitant to start up a conversation in a group of strangers, no longer being overwhelmed in crowded places, not hyperfocusing on details anymore, or adhering to routines and schedules so much.
However, I realise that my interpretation of the question, and the answer that follows from it, may in fact be offensive of insulting to some people who have different opinions on the nature of ASDs and "neurotypicality", and I must respect those opinions.
For example, I don't think that if I "lost my autism" (for lack of better phrasing), I'd lose my individuality, my interests, or that I'd suddenly care for the social pecking order. Why do I think that, because I've met plenty of so-called "NT's" who have far more fascinating interests than I do, and don't care about the shallow part of social life.
_________________
clarity of thought before rashness of action