Evolution of mankind = Studs not Aspies

Post Reply New Topic

Reproduction of babies enables a species to survive in the short-run, but in the long-run when the species becomes overpopulated, the world can no longer support them due to the limited amount of resources. So, in that case studliness in a species would not survive. In evolutionary terms, species who live on and pass on their genes are going to be the ones in which they don't reproduce too little or too much of their species. Everything has to be balanced.

I imagine that the first 'humans' to change will and will always be in the minority. I just believe it just cant happen any other way so I don't see why 'studs' would just over shadow 'aspies.' I think if you stopped analyzing at that point, yes, logic would have the more hornier specie winning but there are so many more areas to focus on its not funny - one area are those studs having the 'gene' capable of forming 'aspie' children.

Again, think of the first fish to walk on land were probably part of the extreme few but I see rabbits, squirrels, and crocks all walking on land so they got by just fine. Some legless fish had a gene that made its offspring have legs

While its true that a species has to balance with its environment the human species balance is borked beyond repair.

We're already dangerously close to outstripping our environments ability to support us (arguably we're over that precipice already) so further overpopulation wont matter.

And when the overreproducing members of the species has destroyed the habitat and made it unsuitable for human life even the underreproducing members of the species will die.

To make things worse during the ensuing famines and riots natural selection will favor the most irrationally violent.

If Aspies are like the mute crickets then NTs are like the noisy ones. The difference is that nothing is killing of the NTs, while leaving the Aspies unharmed.

Is there any reports about the 'ratio' of aspies to NT's and whether that ratio is decreasing or increasing? I think if we had access to a statistic like that (as much as I hate statistics) it would help us out

Ive heard a lot of different ratios but most of them fall between 200:1 and 100:1

Well, I've heard those same, but the thing is, its too 'broad.' Essentially, and I doubt this number exists, I would like to know if these ratios are coming closer together. So, in 50 years, will it be 198:1 or 99:1?

Well, on a second note though I have a feeling at least that if it weren't for all the people who are just going around and making babies without really caring too much about it the white race would probably have about 100 years left - everyone else is having what, on average 2 or 3 times as many kids as we are and in a lot of countries and particularly in europe I don't even think we're making replacement rate. Don't get me wrong, I'm not any kind of religious or supremecy nut, I just think its really funny that we're the one race who's probably going to go extinct on our own arrogance - ie. not having enough kids, people being unfit to be parents if they aren't 'cool' enough or stereotypical of the norm in terms of how they walk, talk, sleep, think, etc. . Who knows, maybe the world would be a better place without us but at the same time I kinda doubt it - then it would just be open game to figure out which race would start making the same mistakes themselves either out of economic disposition, social, or whatever.

Getting back to aspies though - I agree, compared to studs our replacement rate is pretty weak. Its a sheer game of numbers and the only way it could happen to where aspies inherit the earth is if they whole genome itself falls that far into decay that even all the studs are just bringing aspie/autie kids in. That, I could see happening. Us out-propagating them, my guess is that'll happen when hell freezes over.

Tonight, I impregnanted 4 women with the potential of a 5th! Long Live Aspie!

Hahaha, nice. Hope the next 20 years or so aren't too hard on ya .

In the past countries with high percentage of Aspies tend to try their luck in taking over the world Germany, Japan now America. This is one of the reasons why the aspie gene still survives. It is the most technological country that often wins a war.

In the past countries with high percentage of Aspies tend to try their luck in taking over the world Germany, Japan now America. This is one of the reasons why the aspie gene still survives. It is the most technological country that often wins a war.

Now in peacetime I cannot really say if the aspie gene is going to be on the increase. All I know is the upperclass gent is on the decrease.

Good job.

You know I just thought of something.

While an NT "stud" may be more likely to get a female initially they are also more likely to be "kept" by the female (through marriage, etc).

If some of the boards Ive seen are any indication the NT spouses of an ASD individual are usually more likely to want a divorce as soon as they realize the person isnt normal, leaving the ASDer free to further propogate their genes.

I will do something extremely rare (for me) and not read what anybody else wrote.
I think that women will have s3x with stud men, but reproduce with Aspie Men.
Also vice versa.
Reason: Children are becoming extremely expensive and women need to rely on someone who is willing to provide for their child. And I can see guys going with non stud women for knowing how to properly care for a child.

I thought of something similar to this last night. I've heard girls talk about guys as being good 'fathers.' One told me 'I would be' but had no interest in me. I'm boiling it down to; 'girls want to have fun, while young, and, apparently, we won't suffice. However, when it comes to family, we are perfect and they are more interested.'

You know what? I really dont know, they are all messed up

Screw it

I am female.

However, given the pattern of my previous obessions, if such a thing was likely to occur I'd end up reading a load of baby books. Not that I wasn't a bookworm to start with.