The site where they BASH Aspie husband and wives. :O
Wow. So this loser excuse for a woman admits that she is being financially supported by a man who she considers "disabled" ?!
Last edited by Al725 on 12 May 2014, 3:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Presumably , he can't be all bad, or she wouldn't have married him, or did she just see what she wanted to?
If you read the posted bit she wrote, she apparently started out as his "special interest" -- lots of attention, love, etc. -- and then he dropped her emotionally and found a new interest, leaving her in a cold and loveless marriage, one she can't leave without harming her children.
You need to read the rest of my post.
She is already harming the children, if this is the attitude she has towards their father, and by her own admission, will not tell him, but would rather hide and post nasty stuff about him than have an honest conversation.
Sorry, but nothing in life is a guarantee. Either of them could got hit by a bus tomorrow, or lose their job and the kids will grow up up in poverty.
People need to think of this before they get married and have kids
Amen to that. Sounds classic self centered woman syndrome. I'd be willing to bet she put on a bunch of wait and got really bitchy after years of marriage. Probably lazy too. These traits would probably cause any man to lose interest romantically.
Why do you keep insisting on this? She's willing to stay in a situation that's horrible for her in order to protect the children. Why don't you see that as giving?
I suppose because her attitude toward her husband reminds me of my mother's attitude toward me as a child.
If an adult is holding the world responsible for his or her unhappiness, they are blaming. You make a good point, Tarantella, and maybe this person is able to give love to her kids. But at the moment she was writing, she's making it the kids' fault she feels she has to stay with her husband. Maybe it was just a moment, maybe not.
Growing up believing I was bad and creating unhappiness for my mother, and everyone, and incapable of giving to the world was extremely difficult. Extremely painful,Tarantella. So as an adult, I know my mother complained about me, my father, and others she "had" to put up with, and I'm sure she gave what she could. She just has not had much to give anyone, ever. And if pressed to say who was more noticeably ASD, that would be her, much more so than my father. Yet she was the one complaining and blaming.
So I don't see her as giving because although she writes as if that were the case in her mind, I don't see evidence in what she wrote that actual giving is occurring. And the question of whether she is giving isn't one I see as answerable based on her perspective. That question is answered not based on what she thinks or feels, but rather based on what the recipients think and feel and/or what observers think and feel. We are all capable of lying to ourselves to some degree. I'm sure she thinks she is giving, that isn't in doubt. I disagree with her rigid and limiting perspective, knowing I don't have all the facts and could be wrong.
Last edited by Waterfalls on 12 May 2014, 6:05 am, edited 2 times in total.
One also has to consider that we are only getting her side of the story.
Perhaps she was her special interest. To that I say people who believe in prince charming and happily ever after need to stop watching disneyland and get a dose of reality. Peter Pan died. Ariel turned to foam on the ocean. If it looks too good to be true, it is.
Maybe the truth is , he's stressed out by a handful of kids she had because she "accidently" got pregnant a handful of times. Or he has a stressful job with long hours, or chronic back pain, or an opressive mortgage. Maybe she put on 50kg and refuses to bathe.
Maybe one should consider that 50% of marriages fail - so NT's are doing a crap job regardless of who they are married to.
Perhaps she was her special interest. To that I say people who believe in prince charming and happily ever after need to stop watching disneyland and get a dose of reality. Peter Pan died. Ariel turned to foam on the ocean. If it looks too good to be true, it is.
Maybe the truth is , he's stressed out by a handful of kids she had because she "accidently" got pregnant a handful of times. Or he has a stressful job with long hours, or chronic back pain, or an opressive mortgage. Maybe she put on 50kg and refuses to bathe.
Maybe one should consider that 50% of marriages fail - so NT's are doing a crap job regardless of who they are married to.
Indeed, that's the whole thing with internet stories. We get a tiny part of a huge truth and many details or major facts and context are left out.
I won't deny that reading that stung a bit. Especially the part with ''if the Aspie..'' *shivers*
I didn't really need this look into the ways NTs can view us. Believe it or not, but some/a few people talked to me about their Aspie spouses/relatives, unknowing that I am one myself. People do say things like ''he's weird and I think he's f*****g the dog'' and ''why can't they just kill all people with mental disorders'' and stuff like that.
I'm interested in what his side of the story is. Why is he turning away from her? Not necessarily to excuse him, but to balance it all a bit. I feel I can't have an opinion on all this just based on this rant.
_________________
Crazy cat lady, unfortunately without the cats.
(not a native speaker)
They have a business together. It's a mom and pop shop, she works there too. It's not doing well. She is not being financially supported by him, but if she leaves, what business they have falls apart, and she has nothing to support the kids with.
Why do you keep insisting on this? She's willing to stay in a situation that's horrible for her in order to protect the children. Why don't you see that as giving?
I suppose because her attitude toward her husband reminds me of my mother's attitude toward me as a child.
If an adult is holding the world responsible for his or her unhappiness, they are blaming. You make a good point, Tarantella, and maybe this person is able to give love to her kids. But at the moment she was writing, she's making it the kids' fault she feels she has to stay with her husband. Maybe it was just a moment, maybe not.
Growing up believing I was bad and creating unhappiness for my mother, and everyone, and incapable of giving to the world was extremely difficult. Extremely painful,Tarantella. So as an adult, I know my mother complained about me, my father, and others she "had" to put up with, and I'm sure she gave what she could. She just has not had much to give anyone, ever. And if pressed to say who was more noticeably ASD, that would be her, much more so than my father. Yet she was the one complaining and blaming.
So I don't see her as giving because although she writes as if that were the case in her mind, I don't see evidence in what she wrote that actual giving is occurring. And the question of whether she is giving isn't one I see as answerable based on her perspective. That question is answered not based on what she thinks or feels, but rather based on what the recipients think and feel and/or what observers think and feel. We are all capable of lying to ourselves to some degree. I'm sure she thinks she is giving, that isn't in doubt. I disagree with her rigid and limiting perspective, knowing I don't have all the facts and could be wrong.
Well...it seems to me that you're reading your story, not her story.
I see nothing in what she writes that says she blames her children. It is a fact that she's responsible for her children, and she recognizes that she's trapped, but there are absolutely no words, phrases, sentences in there saying she blames them for their existence or the position she's in. She's also explicit in not blaming her husband for his AS and the effect it has on her. She is, however, saying it's horrible and trying to warn others away from accidentally entering the same kind of life.
If she's in a marriage so bad she feels terribly trapped and joyless, but she stays anyway so that her children don't go through upheaval and poverty, then she is indeed giving. It would be a great relief to her to leave, but she gives that up for them.
She is also, if all we're going by is that post, being very careful not to complain in front of her husband -- she says she sneaks away to post. To vent on a board with people who understand what she's going through. She's also clear about why she does that. She knows it's not her husband's fault, and furthermore it wouldn't do any good; he doesn't understand what he does that causes so much pain, and doesn't understand that her pain has anything to do with him. Which she also understands is not his fault. The awareness just isn't there in him. Given that her pain is real, is she supposed just not to say anything to anyone?
ETA: She's not blaming "the world" for her unhappiness. She's pretty clear about the problem: she married a guy who treated her beautifully; then he dropped her stone cold and was/is oblivious to the emotional effects, and furthermore she can't get away from him and his continuing maltreatment of her (and obliviousness). If one person in a marriage suddenly loses interest in the other, then yes, that usually has a profound effect on the other spouse.
Perhaps she was her special interest. To that I say people who believe in prince charming and happily ever after need to stop watching disneyland and get a dose of reality. Peter Pan died. Ariel turned to foam on the ocean. If it looks too good to be true, it is.
Maybe the truth is , he's stressed out by a handful of kids she had because she "accidently" got pregnant a handful of times. Or he has a stressful job with long hours, or chronic back pain, or an opressive mortgage. Maybe she put on 50kg and refuses to bathe.
Maybe one should consider that 50% of marriages fail - so NT's are doing a crap job regardless of who they are married to.
So is it generally your practice, when someone says they're having a rough time in a marriage, to suggest that they're morbidly obese, smelly liars who trick men into having babies?
A serious question: In what manner is it okay for the spouse, parent, or child of someone with ASD to say that the ASD deficiencies/problems/etc. -- and/or the caregiving tasks/expense/worries associated -- are causing them pain, distress, unhappiness, loss of freedom, despair, fear, etc? Or is this just not okay to do? Or to feel?
It's always fine to talk about your experience and emotional response to it.
It is generally NOT OK to generalize about people based on ASD based on the worst of that, particularly when your experience flies in the face of at least some experiences reported by others.
A good test is to substitute the name of a group that has been subject to wrongful stereotyping and victimization through such generalizations, e.g., people with relatively high levels of melanin and dark skin pigmentation, people with semitic features and cultural identity, homosexuals. If the way you are generalizing wouldn't seem right when applied to one of these groups, it's a good indicator that you should not be using the same kind of language about people with ASDs.
Go ahead and call your spouse a (your expletive of choice here) all you want, but do to "aspies" or autistics as a group and you are doing something wrong.
It's not that hard to understand, even if you are really pissed off at someone who has been impossible to live with.
http://sethadamsmith.com/2013/11/02/mar ... t-for-you/
It was in that very moment that I knew that Kim was the right person to marry. I realized that I wanted to make her happy; to see her smile every day, to make her laugh every day. I wanted to be a part of her family, and my family wanted her to be a part of ours. And thinking back on all the times I had seen her play with my nieces, I knew that she was the one with whom I wanted to build our own family.
My father?s advice was both shocking and revelatory. It went against the grain of today?s ?Walmart philosophy?, which is if it doesn?t make you happy, you can take it back and get a new one.
No, a true marriage (and true love) is never about you. It?s about the person you love?their wants, their needs, their hopes, and their dreams. Selfishness demands, ?What?s in it for me??, while Love asks, ?What can I give??
Some time ago, my wife showed me what it means to love selflessly. For many months, my heart had been hardening with a mixture of fear and resentment. Then, after the pressure had built up to where neither of us could stand it, emotions erupted. I was callous. I was selfish.
But instead of matching my selfishness, Kim did something beyond wonderful?she showed an outpouring of love. Laying aside all of the pain and anguish I had caused her, she lovingly took me in her arms and soothed my soul.
I realized that I had forgotten my dad?s advice. While Kim?s side of the marriage had been to love me, my side of the marriage had become all about me. This awful realization brought me to tears, and I promised my wife that I would try to be better.
I don't think it's good advice. A marriage is for both partners. When you have children, that's something else -- yes, you're responsible. You can't be absent from the map altogether, but the things they need come first, and you also need to be there supporting your children's other parent. Marriage is for adults, though.
Read it again. It's not saying that marriage isn't for both partners. It's saying that it isn't about ONE partner. It's not meant for one partner to make themselves happy or just focus on getting their own needs met.
This woman is stuck on how she's not getting what SHE wants out of the situation.
It is saying that but it is also saying the other thing, look at the bit in bold.
_________________
Welcome to the inside of your head. It's kind of empty in here.
Ma-Ma is not the law. I am the law.
Maybe you didn't click the link (we're not allowed to quote entire articles here, else I would have)
http://sethadamsmith.com/2013/11/02/mar ... t-for-you/
And, paradoxically, the more you truly love that person, the more love you receive. And not just from your significant other, but from their friends and their family and thousands of others you never would have met had your love remained self-centered.
Perhaps she was her special interest. To that I say people who believe in prince charming and happily ever after need to stop watching disneyland and get a dose of reality. Peter Pan died. Ariel turned to foam on the ocean. If it looks too good to be true, it is.
Maybe the truth is , he's stressed out by a handful of kids she had because she "accidently" got pregnant a handful of times. Or he has a stressful job with long hours, or chronic back pain, or an opressive mortgage. Maybe she put on 50kg and refuses to bathe.
Maybe one should consider that 50% of marriages fail - so NT's are doing a crap job regardless of who they are married to.
So is it generally your practice, when someone says they're having a rough time in a marriage, to suggest that they're morbidly obese, smelly liars who trick men into having babies?
You don't read very well do you?
But to answer the question, I would tell her to stop hiding behind her computer and talk to him, which is what I said a few posts ago.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Dating Site |
10 May 2025, 7:51 pm |
If you're aspie and you know it, flap your hands! |
09 Jul 2025, 9:41 pm |
Worried I've lost my aspie friend and he's being manipulated |
29 May 2025, 8:54 pm |