Is Anyone Here A Smoker
Aristophanes wrote:
boofle wrote:
if i've understood my reading correctly (feel free to correct me pls) then "stimming" can be almost involuntary. it's a "need". it helps alleviate stress etc and is ritualised behaviour. it can be made up of actions and/or words n phrases. it is not done from "choice" but from necessity.
at worst, some stims may be embarrassing (if done in public as an example) ...and it's considered anti-social behaviour according to the societal n cultural norms based upon location etc.
smoking on the other hand, starts from "choice". i think that is crucial (and critical) that attention is drawn to this difference between stimming (which is an innate need) versus smoking (which begins as a choice)
stimming causes no physical harm to health is my understanding. smoking absolutely does, for most.
also, smoking only becomes "ritual" after the "habit and addiction" has taken hold and this i feel, is why chichikov is calling it dangerous, for to suggest smoking as a stim would then suggest it is acceptable to smoke and call it a stim, ergo being helpless to stop. nicotine is cited as being in the top 5 most addictive drugs in the world, so unwise indeed to suggest smoking as stimming, maybe?
by and large, and to my knowledge, stimming does not have a physiological impact. i do not dispute that both smoking and stimming have a psychological impact but, as far as i am aware, stimming does not have a physiological impact.
if my reasoning is accurate, then indeed, even suggesting smoking as a stim could indeed be deemed "dangerous" ...especially where there may be readers that are impressionable, for wont of a better way of expressing myself...certainly that is what i took away from reading chichikov's post.
for ref.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style ... 24746.html
and now, let the wee'ing contest commence
at worst, some stims may be embarrassing (if done in public as an example) ...and it's considered anti-social behaviour according to the societal n cultural norms based upon location etc.
smoking on the other hand, starts from "choice". i think that is crucial (and critical) that attention is drawn to this difference between stimming (which is an innate need) versus smoking (which begins as a choice)
stimming causes no physical harm to health is my understanding. smoking absolutely does, for most.
also, smoking only becomes "ritual" after the "habit and addiction" has taken hold and this i feel, is why chichikov is calling it dangerous, for to suggest smoking as a stim would then suggest it is acceptable to smoke and call it a stim, ergo being helpless to stop. nicotine is cited as being in the top 5 most addictive drugs in the world, so unwise indeed to suggest smoking as stimming, maybe?
by and large, and to my knowledge, stimming does not have a physiological impact. i do not dispute that both smoking and stimming have a psychological impact but, as far as i am aware, stimming does not have a physiological impact.
if my reasoning is accurate, then indeed, even suggesting smoking as a stim could indeed be deemed "dangerous" ...especially where there may be readers that are impressionable, for wont of a better way of expressing myself...certainly that is what i took away from reading chichikov's post.
for ref.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style ... 24746.html
and now, let the wee'ing contest commence

Again, just because something is harmful does not mean that it cannot be a stim. I'm not looking at this through a moral viewpoint, I'm looking at it through a clinical viewpoint and I'll explain why: If a person is autistic and they're using cigarettes as a stim, then they are most likely going to be unsuccessful if they attempt to quit, more so than the population at large, because it's not just the nicotine addiction they're trying to beat but the stimming as well (which as far as I know is impossible). Now, if the autistic person realizes they're using cigarettes as a stim they will be much more successful because they'll know they need to transition to some other kind of stim before/while transitioning off of cigarettes. Treating both problems as a singular one is the best way to fail at solving both.
One other point I would make is that while stimming is natural for autistics what they use to stim doesn't necessarily need to be 'natural'. The new craze, fidget toys, is an example this.
i'll start from the bottom up because i sense that perhaps you kinda understand what i am trying to say. even tho we are not agreeing with each other.
as you have said, stimming is a "natural act/action" for those on the spectrum but, this does not mean external methods may not be introduced, and you mention the toys. up to this point we are in agreement, at least lol
my reading also leads me to understand that stimming may not be denied, and to do so causes harm to the individual. i.e, the individual has no choice, but to stim. this is where we part company, because smoking is a lifestyle choice. stimming is not a lifestyle choice, it is an outcome of having ASD.
i do not doubt that "just because something is harmful it may not be a stim"...i was contesting the choice to smoke that one makes before it ever can get the chance to become a stim. to me, the question that OP asked could as well have been, "is going to the gym considered a stim?"...both are lifestyle choices. both offer the appropriate chemical responses. both are medically proven to be negative, and/or positive, respectively.
therefore, to my mind, to compare the outcomes of a condition (stimming/ASD) with the addictive properties of a negative lifestyle choice (smoking)...well, if it's not ridiculous, then what is it? honesty IS important here, right?
with the former, one has no choice, with the latter, there is always choice. if one makes bad choices, irrespective of brain wiring, then the outcomes will also have to be dealt with imo.
that's not me taking a moral position but just plain common sense, no?
the OP asked;
Quote:
Is smoking considered a stim ?
and then went on to ask Quote:
Also are there any smokers where ASD contributed to you starting smoking ?
...and it's the above line of questioning that caused me to pause...what is the meaning of this question here? perhaps unwisely but, i put the whole together and felt it was important to respond accordingly.
i mean, WHY would ASD cause someone to start smoking? bad choices causes one to start smoking, surely?
SaveFerris wrote:
I don't see how stimming cannot have a physiological impact
but you can accept that it doesn't cause cancer, emphysema, stroke etc etc, right? cos that's the point i was making.
personally, the tone that the thread has taken is not to my liking. i said what i needed to say...i'm done.
boofle wrote:
the OP asked;
Quote:
Is smoking considered a stim ?
and then went on to ask Quote:
Also are there any smokers where ASD contributed to you starting smoking ?
...and it's the above line of questioning that caused me to pause...what is the meaning of this question here? perhaps unwisely but, i put the whole together and felt it was important to respond accordingly.
i mean, WHY would ASD cause someone to start smoking? bad choices causes one to start smoking, surely?
The question about ASD contributing to you starting smoking is not just stimming related , I'm talking about the bigger picture of having ASD , growing up in a time where smoking was socially acceptable , your parents smoked around you , and all the people you wanted to be friends with smoked. Yes I can agree with you that starting to smoke is a bad choice but was that bad choice based on faulty logic that ASD can create i.e. If I act like these people I want to be friends with , I've got a better chance of fitting in thus I'm gonna smoke , wear uncomfortable clothes , go to the pub , have sex with 'x' just coz everyone else is doing it - you get the picture.
boofle wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
I don't see how stimming cannot have a physiological impact
but you can accept that it doesn't cause cancer, emphysema, stroke etc etc, right? cos that's the point i was making.
personally, the tone that the thread has taken is not to my liking. i said what i needed to say...i'm done.
Just in case you come back.
Of course I can accept that but you seemed to suggest that smoking could not be a stim as stimming didn't have a physiological impact which IMO does not seem logical , it must have otherwise it wouldn't feel good.
_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1
Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard
SaveFerris wrote:
Yes I can agree with you that starting to smoke is a bad choice but was that bad choice based on faulty logic that ASD can create i.e. If I act like these people I want to be friends with , I've got a better chance of fitting in thus I'm gonna smoke , wear uncomfortable clothes , go to the pub , have sex with 'x' just coz everyone else is doing it - you get the picture.
That's not faulty logic you're describing though, that's peer pressure and all teens suffer that. Isn't that something that people with ASD are *more* able to resist? Don't they tend to have a "stronger sense of logic", aren't they more prone to follow their own path? I'm not saying they don't succumb to peer pressure like everyone else, but if I had to make an argument about if they were more or less prone to it I would say less rather than more. For the relatively high-functioning anyway, maybe not the lower-functioning who may be more vulnerable.
Chichikov wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Yes I can agree with you that starting to smoke is a bad choice but was that bad choice based on faulty logic that ASD can create i.e. If I act like these people I want to be friends with , I've got a better chance of fitting in thus I'm gonna smoke , wear uncomfortable clothes , go to the pub , have sex with 'x' just coz everyone else is doing it - you get the picture.
That's not faulty logic you're describing though, that's peer pressure and all teens suffer that. Isn't that something that people with ASD are *more* able to resist? Don't they tend to have a "stronger sense of logic", aren't they more prone to follow their own path? I'm not saying they don't succumb to peer pressure like everyone else, but if I had to make an argument about if they were more or less prone to it I would say less rather than more. For the relatively high-functioning anyway, maybe not the lower-functioning who may be more vulnerable.
I thought peer pressure involved encouragement or disapproval from your peers?
_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1
Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard
Joe90 wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Joe90 wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Joe90 wrote:
Where's the "smoking is a stupid disgusting habit and I don't wish to abuse my body that way" option?
I hate the idea of smoking. People who smoke heavily come up with all these excuses and they blame everything but the smoking when they get a constant bad cough.
I hate the idea of smoking. People who smoke heavily come up with all these excuses and they blame everything but the smoking when they get a constant bad cough.
I didn't have that option because it was a neutral thread - it's not a pro smoking thread
I know, I was just joking.
My bad


It's OK, it's not so easy to detect a joke on message board because there's no tone of voice to back it up. I should have put an emoticon there.

I do have very strong opinions about smoking.
Thanks , the only strong opinions I have about smoking surface when my daughter or kids are involved.
_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1
Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard
SaveFerris wrote:
Chichikov wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Yes I can agree with you that starting to smoke is a bad choice but was that bad choice based on faulty logic that ASD can create i.e. If I act like these people I want to be friends with , I've got a better chance of fitting in thus I'm gonna smoke , wear uncomfortable clothes , go to the pub , have sex with 'x' just coz everyone else is doing it - you get the picture.
That's not faulty logic you're describing though, that's peer pressure and all teens suffer that. Isn't that something that people with ASD are *more* able to resist? Don't they tend to have a "stronger sense of logic", aren't they more prone to follow their own path? I'm not saying they don't succumb to peer pressure like everyone else, but if I had to make an argument about if they were more or less prone to it I would say less rather than more. For the relatively high-functioning anyway, maybe not the lower-functioning who may be more vulnerable.
I thought peer pressure involved encouragement or disapproval from your peers?
Not necessarily, it includes a feeling of pressure to conform or fit in. It happens as children grow up and learn things like social acceptance and become influenced by friends. Both things that if anything someone with ASD is probably less likely to experience. Not sure if anyone has studied this or not.
Chichikov wrote:
Not necessarily, it includes a feeling of pressure to conform or fit in. It happens as children grow up and learn things like social acceptance and become influenced by friends. Both things that if anything someone with ASD is probably less likely to experience. Not sure if anyone has studied this or not.
I would of thought that someone with ASD would be more vulnerable to peer pressure due to wanting to fit in - who knows - everyone's different.
_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1
Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard
SaveFerris wrote:
Chichikov wrote:
Not necessarily, it includes a feeling of pressure to conform or fit in. It happens as children grow up and learn things like social acceptance and become influenced by friends. Both things that if anything someone with ASD is probably less likely to experience. Not sure if anyone has studied this or not.
I would of thought that someone with ASD would be more vulnerable to peer pressure due to wanting to fit in - who knows - everyone's different.
Wanting to fit in requires an understanding of social norms, social structure, group relationships and dynamics etc.
Chichikov wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Chichikov wrote:
Not necessarily, it includes a feeling of pressure to conform or fit in. It happens as children grow up and learn things like social acceptance and become influenced by friends. Both things that if anything someone with ASD is probably less likely to experience. Not sure if anyone has studied this or not.
I would of thought that someone with ASD would be more vulnerable to peer pressure due to wanting to fit in - who knows - everyone's different.
Wanting to fit in requires an understanding of social norms, social structure, group relationships and dynamics etc.
ok , so maybe the concept of 'fitting in' only comes with hindsight or good insight ( this forum is full of people who say different though) but I don't think you need to understand social structure etc to want to be the same as everyone else i.e fitting in.
_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1
Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard
Think of it like this....will a blind man covet your jacket? Want it for himself? No, because he can't see it, he doesn't appreciate the concept of things being visually appealing. So is someone who is socially blind going to covet strong bonds in peer group relationships? Probably not for the same reason the blind man doesn't really care about your jacket.
Edit: As I've said though, this is just a theory, I have no idea if anyone has actually done studies on this
Chichikov wrote:
Think of it like this....will a blind man covet your jacket? Want it for himself? No, because he can't see it, he doesn't appreciate the concept of things being visually appealing. So is someone who is socially blind going to covet strong bonds in peer group relationships? Probably not for the same reason the blind man doesn't really care about your jacket.
Edit: As I've said though, this is just a theory, I have no idea if anyone has actually done studies on this
Edit: As I've said though, this is just a theory, I have no idea if anyone has actually done studies on this
I get where your coming from but I think what your talking about is an extreme case scenario , your not taking into account the spectrum that ranges from complete social blindness ( if such a thing exists ) to minor social impairment. And I'm gonna take a guess based purely on what I've read here , the majority of people with ASD are not completely socially blind.
_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1
Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard
conanthewarrior
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Joined: 1 Apr 2017
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 64
Location: UK