LabPet wrote:
I do believe, from evidence, that autistic thought is simply not congruent with socio/verbal mechanisms; the construct, maybe the 'shape' (no descriptive word here) of autistic thought is not equatable. I should have said QUALITATIVE, not quantitative, difference in thought construct.
I learned "scripts"/"songs" of acceptable, successful, "conversational" style, but when I talk to people honestly, being "real" about what I'm thinking, depending on who I am talking to, my speech either gets slow and monotone,
or very fast and, apparently, unintelligible because sentence structure disappears and I only pronounce half of words, as if I were writing shorthand notes. I also completely lose touch with when I should stop or start talking, whereas when I am just following the copied/mimicked social song I have a reasonably good idea of conversational rhythm.
I am definitely not non-verbal but I am aware of how difficult language use can be. I liked what you said, LabPet.
There is more and more academic support for the idea that language is very like an independent organism which has evolved and adapted to survive in "symbiosis" with human brains. Those bits which were difficult for average/"normal" brains to learn, manipulate/use, etc fell out of use/died off.
Language genuinely is not adapted to AS brains. It is like software for a different hardware, or something. So it is very clunky for us to use. Have to switch off lots of other functions in order to be able use it, etc.
Last edited by ouinon on 14 Apr 2008, 2:35 am, edited 4 times in total.