What has been your biggest revelation about NTs?

Post Reply New Topic

Plausible deniability is basically a contingency plan. The person has an intent of (A) and hopes to achieve a certain result (X). But the person knows ahead of time that Y or Z might happen instead of X. Just in case things go wrong, they want to be able to deny their intent.

The person does not openly reveal their intent or their desired outcome. That would be too risky. Instead they use hints or suggestion, or reveal very gradually, and test the other person's reactions.

If the other person's interpretation and/or responses seem unfavorable, at some point they may abandon plan A and move on to B or C, and they will deny ever having any intentions of plan A.

All allistic communication is essentially based on plausible deniability to some extent. It's a way of being vague or indirect so that things are left open to multiple interpretations.

I had not really realized how differently NTs process things until I suspected I was ASD. For instance, I realized the reason I kept having so many misunderstandings about people's moods was that I was not reading their expressions or body language, or missing it altogether. I'd be baffled when someone seemed to expect me to read their mind somehow. Apparently something was going on that I was missing. At the time, I just thought they were being unreasonable. I realized at some point that most people don't need to puzzle out other people's moods by consciously analyzing the movements of their facial muscles or positions of their bodies, and that they do it with a much higher level of success than I do. NTs didn't frantically run through a list of memorized scripts in order to have a conversation that wasn't work-related. NTs didn't have pauses lasting several seconds. I just thought I was a dullard at conversations. I've now found that while conversation is a convoluted, complicated set of procedures for me, it is automatic for NTs.

A typical encounter for me might start with me examining a person's face for clues: Hmmm. Eyebrows scrunched together, eyelids narrowed. Category: negative emotion. Anger? Sadness? Tired? Upset stomach? Lips compressed, neck bent, eyes gazing intensely, shoulders hunched. Anger! At me? Himself? Someone else? Am I in danger? Muscles not tensed to leap on me... violence improbable. Can we talk about this? Better ask ...

And so on... hopefully our hypothetical person hasn't gotten angrier at me because I've been standing there silently for several seconds trying to work out what's wrong with him... Of course, starting with a generic "Hey, what's up?" is always more efficient, but picking out the right conversation starter can be pretty daunting too (in which I get stuck wondering if "Hey, what's up" is better than "Are you mad?" or "What's wrong with you??")

I don't think its particularly an NT thing....I notice a general lack of empathy in society, and since neurotypicals are the majority since there's more of them it would appear they more often lack empathy. But hell even on this site I have seen some things that are quite the opposite of empathy so I don't think empathy depends on being autistic or not.

I don't understand how NT people can feel better or be entertained from bullying others, but I've learned that they do. I also don't understand how NT people could act like they don't like something that you have because they are jealous of it; wouldn't it make more sense to try to steal it if they want it?

I've also been shocked about the extent to which emotion affects NT people's political views and beliefs. So many people get upset when you try to be logical! I get that everyone has emotions, but put them in your pocket when you participate in democracy and think things through!