Page 5 of 7 [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next


Christian name or honorific?
Christian name 58%  58%  [ 18 ]
Honorific 42%  42%  [ 13 ]
Total votes : 31

IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 72,433
Location: Chez Quis

05 Jan 2019, 4:41 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
I would purport that those names were names of past relatives.

In Judaism, a baby cannot be named after a living relative, including the father (If he is alive). There are no “juniors,” at least in Askenazi Judaism.

I stand corrected as far as Catholicism is concerned.


My brother's second name (of four) is the one he uses, and the only one that isn't a saint.


_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 Jan 2019, 4:42 pm

I’m not really sure. I’ll have to do research on this. I don’t hear that much about that from the Jewish people I know.



ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,399

05 Jan 2019, 5:08 pm

DeepHour wrote:
...and If I may be permitted a bit of a Saturday Night Rant, I really loathe the modern tendency in the UK to use surnames as first names. Why on earth do parents want to call their offspring Todd, Bradley, Spencer, Madison, etc..?

:? :lol:

I dislike that trend too. Here's a bit of observational comedy that matches my feelings on the matter quite well:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_8j68WyxOU



ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,399

05 Jan 2019, 5:10 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
The correct form is “Sir Richard.”

To me he's plain Dick, but I won't get started on why.



ASS-P
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,980
Location: Santa Cruz , CA , USA

05 Jan 2019, 5:23 pm

...I thought you were Jewish (if perhaps ethnically, not religiously) :? ?








quote="kraftiekortie"]I’m not really sure. I’ll have to do research on this. I don’t hear that much about that from the Jewish people I know.[/quote]


_________________
Renal kidney failure, congestive heart failure, COPD. Can't really get up from a floor position unhelped anymore:-(.
One of the walking wounded ~ SMASHED DOWN by life and age, now prevented from even expressing myself! SOB.
" Oh, no! First you have to PROVE you deserve to go away to college! " ~ My mother, 1978 (the heyday of Andy Gibb and Player). I would still like to go.:-(
My life destroyed by Thorazine and Mellaril - and rape - and the Psychiatric/Industrial Complex. SOB:-(! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 Jan 2019, 5:54 pm

I am, “ethnically,” Jewish on my mother’s side.

I identify with many Jewish issues, though I wish there was a two-state solution in the area once known as Palestine.



IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 72,433
Location: Chez Quis

05 Jan 2019, 6:10 pm

Does anyone here know or observe their Name Day?


_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles


Prometheus18
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Aug 2018
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,866

05 Jan 2019, 6:24 pm

IsabellaLinton wrote:
Does anyone here know or observe their Name Day?

The only place I know of the Name Day convention from is my beloved (as you know) 19th century Russian literature. I assumed that was an Eastern Catholic (Orthodox) thing.



IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 72,433
Location: Chez Quis

05 Jan 2019, 6:27 pm

Prometheus18 wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
Does anyone here know or observe their Name Day?

The only place I know of the Name Day convention from is my beloved (as you know) 19th century Russian literature. I assumed that was an Eastern Catholic (Orthodox) thing.


It is, although I'm not.
I always observed my Name Day because I think it's fun and I like the date. :heart:
I learned about this tradition from a Polish friend.


_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles


Prometheus18
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Aug 2018
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,866

05 Jan 2019, 6:37 pm

IsabellaLinton wrote:
Prometheus18 wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
Does anyone here know or observe their Name Day?

The only place I know of the Name Day convention from is my beloved (as you know) 19th century Russian literature. I assumed that was an Eastern Catholic (Orthodox) thing.


It is, although I'm not.
I always observed my Name Day because I think it's fun and I like the date. :heart:
I learned about this tradition from a Polish friend.


But Polish people are almost invariably Catholic - certainly not Orthodox.



blazingstar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2017
Age: 71
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,234

05 Jan 2019, 7:11 pm

I grew up in midwestern US and it was always, first, middle, last names. Never heard of Christian name until I was much older.

I am surprised we have so little representation from south and central american in regards to names. Mexican Spanish still has a formal Usted and an informal Tu, although as subjects they are frequently dropped from a sentence, but the verbs are conjugated differently. I always try to use formal version as a sign of respect for the people I work with, but have noticed that most Spanish speaking people that I interact with use the informal tense. There is also a complicated system of naming children that I have not completely figured out, but roughly there is a first name, then the mother's last name, then the father's last name and maybe some family or saint's names thrown in too.

In the South (USA) when a white plantation woman was married, she was referred to as "Miss [first name]. Not Mrs. and not her last name. Ya'll is common southern talk of all races in the rural areas, and is plural. You wouldn't say "Ya'll come down to the barbeque" to one person.

In professional situations, I prefer to be called by my last name. I don't really care whether they say Mrs, Miss, Ms. I do not want to be called into an office by my first name. But I don't make a big deal about.

But what bothers me a lot, and which happened recently, is when someone with "status" (a director) whom I have addressed as "Director So and So" to be polite turns around and addresses me by my first name. In a letter no less.
Or there are people in my field who want me to refer to them as "Dr So and So" and I then introduce myself as "Dr. [my last name]. Like Darmok, I am not a medical doctor, but if someone else is going to throw around his/her PhD, then I will too. Seems necessary in the bureaucratic field I am in. I wouldn't do it on my behalf, but my work is advocating for others.


_________________
The river is the melody
And sky is the refrain
- Gordon Lightfoot


shortfatbalduglyman
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Mar 2017
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,255

05 Jan 2019, 7:29 pm

Prometheus18 wrote:
quite an extreme wrote:
Prometheus18 wrote:
The above two posts are right on the mark. Personally, I bemoan the fact that we don't have a formal second person pronoun in English, too - a Sie or vous. Perhaps this is why standards are a bit higher in Germany.

Wrong. 'You' is quite the same as 'Ihr' (plural majestatis). You don't use 'Thou' (German 'Du') for people that you know animore. :mrgreen:


It used to be, but is not anymore; "you" is now the singular (informal and formal) second person pronoun, which translates as "du" or "Sie" or "ihr" depending on context; there is no separate formal or informal version.

Catlover5 wrote:
Online, I’m fine with people addressing me by my username (Catlover5), my username-nickname (CL) or my real first name (Harry). Of course, I don’t give out my surname online because that would reveal too much personal information about me. Wrong Planet isn’t what I consider a "formal" forum so there isn’t any need to call me "Sir".

In real life, strangers will obviously not know my name or anything else about me. This is where I have a bit of a dilemma. At 19, I am too old to be considered a child, and strangers being informal with me (e.g. calling me "darling" – that happens quite a bit) tends to irk me, but I also feel I am still too young to suit being called "Sir". I’d rather strangers just didn’t call me by any name.

In a number of foreign languages, there are, as pointed out by Prometheus18, multiple second-person pronouns. The distinction between each of them per language is known as the "Tu-Vos distinction". Tu and vos are, respectively, the informal and formal second-pronouns in the Latin language. The informal pronoun is used when e.g. talking to a child or to a person familially close to oneself, and the formal one is used when e.g. talking to a stranger, a person much older than oneself, or a person with whom one only interacts with in professional situations. In these languages, the use of this second-person pronoun system helps one to determine how to address another person. The English language does not use this system however.


"Vos" is not a formal second person pronoun in Latin, but just the plural. There is no formal second person singular pronoun in Latin or Greek. This is why the Quakers used to call everybody "thou"; if we refer to God as "thou" (Greek "su") it would be blasphemous to afford a mortal a greater degree of respect.

Claradoon wrote:
Prometheus18 wrote:
I don't understand the cultural kow-tow whereby people insist on calling it a "first name" rather than a Christian name. It has nothing to do with religion; I'm an atheist and actively dislike most organised religion, and yet I still use the latter term.


Aha. I didn't understand your question at all. I used to live in a nice Jewish neighbourhood. Nobody had a Christian name, even I, who attend a Catholic church. The rule is to turn to law for the definitions.

In the Province of Quebec, a woman keeps her birth name for life, unless she changes it at law, just like men always did. As for Miss/Mrs etc., these are social, not legal, designations and through custom we use Miss and Mrs as indicating having achieved the age to vote.

The surname of the baby is chosen by the parent(s). There is no such thing as an illegitimate baby.


Québec is culturally French, so can hardly be held to anglophone standards.

shortfatbalduglyman wrote:
You choose where you spend money, but it seems to me that picking where to shop based on what name they call you, is kind of making a mountain out of a molehill


Likewise I am only 35 and do not want to be treated like I am old.

I seek competence in the professionals I deal with. Trying to be friends with one's clients rather than doing a good job for them is a sign of a lack of competence.



:D


not everyone that uses your first name is trying to be your friend, incompetent, and unprofessional. although some of them are.


while i do not concur with you on that particular subject, i do know how you feel. i :twisted: hate :roll: getting called a "n***a" or a "boy" or "girl". totally condescending. they are just words, and "actions speak louder than words". but words show their attitude and their attitude is not good :mrgreen: according to my standards :skull: .



CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 118,225
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love

05 Jan 2019, 8:45 pm

Anything but Miss, Madam or Ma-am. Just call me Sir.


_________________
The Family Enigma


CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 118,225
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love

05 Jan 2019, 8:51 pm

I'd rather be called by my first name. I don't like formalities. I'm amazed that formalities didn't die out in the hippie days.


_________________
The Family Enigma


ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,399

05 Jan 2019, 9:19 pm

shortfatbalduglyman wrote:
not everyone that uses your first name is trying to be your friend, incompetent, and unprofessional. although some of them are.

Broadly I agree with that. When I use people's first name, as I like to do all the time, I'm basically calling for mutual empathy and support. I'm not trying to be their friend (that's something that happens if it's going to happen), it's just meant as a friendly gesture. It's also meant to try and cut through some of the hard-heartedness I notice when dealing with certain individuals in bureaucratic positions - probably not much use if they're too far gone to care about people, but worth a shot. Competence is simply what I try to achieve in pretty much everything I do, with some success, and I "expect" it from others whatever we call each other. I guess professional means doing one's job competently, so if I'm (e.g.) dealing with a plumber then that's covered by my competence expectation. Being retired I don't have the burden of any professional expectations of me, and when I had a "responsible" job at the university we always used forenames but I was expected to do my job properly, and I don't think calling each other "Mr." would have made it any different. I can see how using "Mr." etc. might for some people make it easier to keep a bit of distance so that it's easier to complain about a bad job or bargain firmly, but it makes no difference to me, because the actual degree of friendship is another matter entirely, but using forenames helps to remind me that however annoyed I am about the service, I have no right to get any more stroppy with them than I would a friend, and there's really no need to.
Quote:
i :twisted: hate :roll: getting called a "n***a" or a "boy" or "girl". totally condescending. they are just words, and "actions speak louder than words". but words show their attitude and their attitude is not good :mrgreen: according to my standards :skull: .

I'm white so I've never been called a "n***a." All three sound like they're meant as put downs of course, though it's odd to me that they're normally used in that way, because I see nothing especially bad about being black, effeminate, butch or young. I guess one way of hitting back would be to call them a racist, misogynist, homophobe, gerantocrat or pedophobe, as applicable.



ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,399

05 Jan 2019, 9:26 pm

CockneyRebel wrote:
I'd rather be called by my first name. I don't like formalities. I'm amazed that formalities didn't die out in the hippie days.

They did in my case :-)