Want info on possible cures for autism/AS?

Page 5 of 11 [ 176 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next


Want info on possible cures for autism/AS?
Yes - I'm interested 42%  42%  [ 30 ]
No - I'm NOT interested but its OK to post info 24%  24%  [ 17 ]
No - I'm NOT interested. Please don't post info 11%  11%  [ 8 ]
No - I find it offensive. I don't wanna see it 11%  11%  [ 8 ]
No - Don't ever post it. I hate you if you do 11%  11%  [ 8 ]
Total votes : 71

AspieDave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 568
Location: Traverse City, Michigan

02 Jan 2008, 7:23 pm

As a sideline to that line of thought....

from the online edition of the Guardian Unlimited January 3rd date

Quote:
Are humans still evolving?

Steven Pinker, leading psychologist and language expert at Harvard University. Author of The Language Instinct and The Blank Slate.

"I've had to question the overall assumption that human evolution pretty much stopped by the time of the agricultural revolution ... New [laboratory] results have suggested that thousands of genes, perhaps as much as 10% of the human genome, have been under strong recent selection, and the selection may even have accelerated during the past several thousand years ... If these results hold up, and apply to psychologically relevant brain function ... then the field of evolutionary psychology might have to reconsider the simplifying assumption that biological evolution was pretty much over and done with 10-000-50,000 years ago."


I found that interesting in light of the general discussion.


_________________
I tried to get in touch with my feminine side.... but it got a restraining order.....


sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 71
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

02 Jan 2008, 7:25 pm

zendell wrote:
sartresue wrote:
Those who would welcome a cure must realize that if the Asperger's is cured then all the desireable traits will disappear along with the less desireable ones.


I don't think that's true. How do you know the desirable traits aren't part of your personality and the negative traits caused by something else?


Zendell, these are legitimate questions, I will clarify and answer each of these questions as one, as they are part of my whole self.

Aspergian Affirmation

I know all traits are part of my Aspie personality. They are what I am, my conscious awareness. I cannot divorce any of these traits, desireable or not, and still be me. They are as much a part of me as my arms and legs. My personality is a whole, and even greater than the sum of its parts. I accept my personality. I am unique, as each one of is. I call this my existential ecstacy, as opposed to angst. I am happy to be me, and I would not want it any other way. Call it my age if you will, but at least now I can accept what is. :)

This why a cure for me is unthinkable.


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo


nannarob
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,083
Location: Queensland

02 Jan 2008, 7:42 pm

It was very interesting to read your posts Sedaka, Odin and Aspie Dave. It is great that you are working in the area of autism research. From your research I'm sure you will find more strategies to cope with this genetic spectrum.


_________________
NEVER EVER GIVE UP

I think there must be some chronic learning disability that is so prevalent among NT's that it goes unnoticed by the "experts". Krex


zendell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,174
Location: Austin, TX

02 Jan 2008, 9:41 pm

It seems most people are interested in cures/treatments for autism based on poll results so far. I wish there was a separate area to list treatments so I wouldn't offend anyone on general autism discussion section.



gbollard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2007
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,009
Location: Sydney, Australia

02 Jan 2008, 10:17 pm

Quote:
Zendell said:
It seems most people are interested in cures/treatments for autism based on poll results so far. I wish there was a separate area to list treatments so I wouldn't offend anyone on general autism discussion section.


That seems like quite a sensible Idea Zendell but I'm not going to put it to Alex because I've already suggested two changes and don't want to look like I'm trying to change the site. Especially as I'm a relative newbie.

You might want to ask him about that.

Of course, the other alternatives could include starting a new thread for each alternative treatment and putting it into the General Autism Discussion area. I'd suggest that you include in your first post for each, a note warning anti-curebies away since your intent is to discuss details of a given therapy, not force it on people.



LeKiwi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,444
Location: The murky waters of my mind...

03 Jan 2008, 3:17 am

I didnt'realise there were so many people so against a cure on here (whether it's a total cure for autism, which I don't believe is particularly possible, or a cure for the triggers of some symptoms, which probably is). It would be nice to be able to post this information without being called a quack or curebie or bigot - I guess the best way will be probably to just do a warning as was said and post them in here. It's a shame people aren't willing to discuss things reasonably because there are a lot of intelligent people here who could probably at least have some good input, if not benefit from the sharing of info, rather than just turning it into a flamewar all the time. :(


_________________
We are a fever, we are a fever, we ain't born typical...


ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

03 Jan 2008, 3:19 am

It's sick and offensive.



LeKiwi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,444
Location: The murky waters of my mind...

03 Jan 2008, 3:23 am

ShadesOfMe wrote:
It's sick and offensive.


But why? I don't get this mindset. Nobody's trying to lobotomise anyone or change your personality, it's an attempt at making life easier for those who have it. We don't all just have Asperger's syndrome, there are people with autism who genuinely have a very, very difficult life. Even to bring them up to a milder version of autism in terms of their symptoms would be an improvement? Would you deny that to someone who wanted it?


_________________
We are a fever, we are a fever, we ain't born typical...


ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

03 Jan 2008, 3:24 am

LeKiwi wrote:
ShadesOfMe wrote:
It's sick and offensive.


But why? I don't get this mindset. Nobody's trying to lobotomise anyone or change your personality, it's an attempt at making life easier for those who have it. We don't all just have Asperger's syndrome, there are people with autism who genuinely have a very, very difficult life. Even to bring them up to a milder version of autism in terms of their symptoms would be an improvement? Would you deny that to someone who wanted it?


If you want it go ahead, but I think it's sick and offensive. it wouldn't make life easier if there was a "cure". it would change who i am, and thats wrong.



LeKiwi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,444
Location: The murky waters of my mind...

03 Jan 2008, 3:31 am

ShadesOfMe wrote:
LeKiwi wrote:
ShadesOfMe wrote:
It's sick and offensive.


But why? I don't get this mindset. Nobody's trying to lobotomise anyone or change your personality, it's an attempt at making life easier for those who have it. We don't all just have Asperger's syndrome, there are people with autism who genuinely have a very, very difficult life. Even to bring them up to a milder version of autism in terms of their symptoms would be an improvement? Would you deny that to someone who wanted it?


If you want it go ahead, but I think it's sick and offensive. it wouldn't make life easier if there was a "cure". it would change who i am, and thats wrong.


But what about those who are lower functioning than you are and whose lives it has the potential to make so much easier? Are you sick and offended at the thought of helping them to get a better deal?


_________________
We are a fever, we are a fever, we ain't born typical...


ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

03 Jan 2008, 3:32 am

No. But you can't really speak for them. Your kid is your kid, you shouldn't changewho he was born to be.



ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

03 Jan 2008, 4:16 am

LeKiwi wrote:
ShadesOfMe wrote:
It's sick and offensive.

But why? I don't get this mindset. Nobody's trying to lobotomise anyone or change your personality, it's an attempt at making life easier for those who have it. We don't all just have Asperger's syndrome, there are people with autism who genuinely have a very, very difficult life. Even to bring them up to a milder version of autism in terms of their symptoms would be an improvement?

"Why?", you ask.

Well, as i've now said a few times on a few threads it's because of the words aspergers and autism themselves, (see my other two/three posts on this thread , and my thread on "WP Tagline is like saying Homosexuality is not a disease"). As Donna Williams asked in a paper at recent Awares Conference, "Is there such a thing as Autism?", not because she is suggesting that people haven't got a lot of real problems etc, but because the term autism, like aspergers, imposes blanket thinking.

People start identifying with the term, and no longer want to split it up into its many constituents, many of which as you say, and i believe too, are susceptible to prevention, reduction, and better management, or are in fact simply disability-illusions created by societys current preferences in behaviour.
The introversion/High Sensitivity for instance, may well be genetic and unchangeable, but wouldn't be a disavantage or difficulty in a society not so geared to extraverts as this one currently is.

Why people react with such hostility all over this thread and all over the forum to suggestions of a cure is because having identified with the term it becomes like their football team, or a religion, and needs defending against all comers. Very tribal, ....

8)



Last edited by ouinon on 03 Jan 2008, 4:57 am, edited 6 times in total.

ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

03 Jan 2008, 4:33 am

anbuend wrote:
I can sort of pattern-match the collective non-verbal cues of an entire roomful of people (as long as I don't have to interact with them in anything resembling a typical way). If I have to be thinking about words at the time, however, I can't, because I'm thinking about words. people whose receptive language is either sometimes or always completely gone rather than just auditorily garbled, nor does it account for the fact that some people can pay attention to non-verbal cues when not dealing with verbal ones.

I totally get that. Love to watch a crowd in a station when waiting , alone, for a train, and see millions of stories in the "language" of faces and bodies. But if need to wait "with" someone can't do it.
Also re touch, can concentrate only on one "direction" at a time; unless go very very slowly the whole process of sex becomes active-passive ( not great for independent woman in her sexual relationships, unless prepared to explore the formulas of pre-negotiated BDSM,)! I can't "follow" the mutuality of it because i can only clearly feel what I am touching IF am NOT supposed to be feeling someone else touching me at same time. ( a sort of problem with subject/object relations !?! )

I gathered recently that this kind of thing has something to do with poor development of the proprioceptive system as a result, in some/many cases, of enforced immobility , and other " stimuli deprivations" in earliest infancy, which leave whole stretches of brain connections to body esp the senses, undeveloped..... In other words perhaps preventable.

..... in other words..... might easily have ended up "not-me"! Is that what they mean by "The Unbearable Lightness of Being" ?
I still want to understand the ways in which i ended up "me" tho', rather than "not-me". I'm not going to feel threatened by the idea that if i had experienced x rather than y in infancy i would have become not-me. Though i think i have in the past, when i would have preferred to be "not-me". Maybe that's why all this identity labelling has been spreading though, cos we haven't had immortal souls since the 1800s.

8)



TLPG
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 693

03 Jan 2008, 6:14 am

LeKiwi wrote:
No, there is absolutely nothing wrong with people wanting a cure for themselves. Why shouldn't they be allowed that if they want it? What gives you the right to decide who can and can't help themselves be rid of whatever co-morbids have plagued their life and made it hell?

Don't be so arrogant. All our experiences of autism are different, and some cope far better than others. There's nothing bigoted about wanting to help those who want to be helped.


Excuse me, LeKiwi, but point one - there is no cure. Autism at it's root is genetic, and to cure that is DNA fiddling. Unacceptable and will never happen. So yes, there IS something wrong with wanting a cure.

Point two - I don't make the decisions. Medical fact dictates the proceedings, and no one (not you, me, Zendell or anyone else) has any control over that.

Point three - what makes their lives "hell" is the lack of support and the lack of understanding, both within themselves and from others.

The sort of help you are talking about is intolerant, and therefore bigoted. The sort of help I'm talking about is the sort of help that is needed. If that's arrogant, then it's only because I'm responding in kind.

Zendell wrote:
When I say I want to be cured of autism, I mean I want to treat known causes of my symptoms. Does that offend anyone?


Yes it offends me, because wanting treatment for symptoms is NOT a cure. So don't call it a cure. That's why you are offending people in here. Keep it to treatments for any symptoms - then you might get a few more ears.



gwenevyn
l'esprit de l'escalier
l'esprit de l'escalier

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,443

03 Jan 2008, 6:30 am

TLPG wrote:
Keep it to treatments for any symptoms - then you might get a few more ears.


This makes a great deal of sense. The term "cure" is usually inaccurate in the context of autism.


_________________
The machine does not isolate man from the great problems of nature but plunges him more deeply into them. -Antoine de Saint Exupéry


gbollard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2007
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,009
Location: Sydney, Australia

03 Jan 2008, 6:46 am

You've been getting the quack treatment because we aspies and auties are sick and tired of being sold quack ideas. We get it all the time and it's demeaning.

I suppose it's like unsolicited people approaching fat people and telling them to go to the gym or eat less chocolates etc.. or to try Jenny Craig, or the new WonderSlim Drug etc... Some people just want to be left alone. Fat people know that they're fat - if they wanted to try some method to slim down, they'd ask or look around themselves. Of course, one of the worst things you could do is go somewhere where fat people hang out (especially if you, yourself are slim) and start telling them about your "cure".

I've probably just insulted people on this board with that last paragraph. If I have - sorry - I was just trying to demonstrate a point by moving the problem away from Autism and away from the absolutely "incurable" condition.