AnnePande wrote:
anna-banana wrote:
MizLiz wrote:
AnnePande wrote:
Pippi Longstocking (btw an old childhood obsession of mine).

! !! ! AHHHH! That makes so much sense now that I think about it! She's "precocious" "quirky" and any other adjective people used to describe her they could have just said...
No. She has AS.
I also really loved Pippi.
what other traits apart from "quirky" did she have?
none.
Oh yes, I think so:
- She often understood things very literally.
- She didn't care about if her clothes were "socially acceptable".
- She wasn't great at understanding social cues (and indeed she didn't act like she did in order to be rude, because she'd often regret afterwards).
- She was kind of a loner, living together with two animals (no cats though - and she did have 2 very good friends).
- She disliked authorities.
- She had her own kind of logic and tended to think out of the box (all the time, actually).
- (She chews her hair, a kind of stim, but an NT could do that too, of course)
- She does everything her own way (even if others / NTs may think it's more troublesome).
- She sleeps with her head under her blanket and the feet on her pillow (do we see a sensory issue thing here?? - some aspies like to have something over their head eg. while sleeping, I myself can't sleep without the head under the quilt, but I do have the head on my pillow).
There might be more things.

I agree that Pippi Longstocking is an Asperger archetype -- of the female variety. Remember, females don't present the same way men do.
Her not being a "little professor" isn't necessarily the absence of a trait given she had precocious skills of other types. It was implicit in the presentation of the story that we didn't see Pippi Longstocking from an introspective perspective, but always from the outside as if she were a phenomenon of nature. There was never an intricate psychodrama story given for why she was the way she was. Looking from the outside you would just see the skills she had and she could have obtained them in any number of ways, including having special interests she spent all her time on. That in itself is kind of Asperger -- you know them, because you come across them in life, but you don't know them well.
Also, female Aspergers can be more socially capable than Asperger males. So her being idiosyncratic and eccentric is enough for her social asynchrony to be clearly pathological -- i.e. not just an affectation. Her social asynchrony was deep and fundamental enough that it was a a part of her makeup.
Finally, her advanced physical skills are not unlike what I have developed. Asperger females can be tomboys, and when you take the Asperger female tomboy into physical training, the hyper sensorimotor functioning can become the basis for abnormally high physical performance.