These "types" are all just costumes. Costumes aspies put on to deal with the NT world. Yes, we are all of these in some way or another, but there is someone human under these costumes. I don't like it when clinicians describe us solely on these behaviors that are responses to the NT world. "Angry boy", "ADHD boy"...it's like they only want to focus on the costume and not the person underneath the costume. They want to modify, alter the constume so it's more compatible with the NT world, but not address the person underneath the costume. The costume is not our soul and therefore shouldn't be the focus, the tell-all, the crystal ball of an aspie's past, present and future. There's a reason why we have these constumes, but that reason is neurological and still largely out of the reach of current neuroscience understanding. So what is instead grasped by clinicians (while neuroscientists are still in the dark) are the behaviors, the costumes we employ. The brain is still largely uncharted land and these behaviors (logic boy, rule boy, emotion-type boy) are pre-fabricated landmarks that explain nothing about how these landmarks came to be in the first place. Clinicians find the landmark, manipulate the landmark, and then settle.
Might as well label this rant as-- Logic/Anxiety/Angry/Negative.