Skilpadde wrote:
earthmonkey wrote:
I got the 50 percentile, IQ 102. Nothing to complain about, but it's odd how none of my tests scores want to agree with each other, both official and non-official tests.
Same for me. I have scored from 90 to 137 on different tests, mostly around 120-125 on the ones closer to WAIS-III. I do better at verbal tests than visuals. well, at least it wasn't maths!
....
I wonder what the 'rank' thing mean....
I suspect it's to do with your percentile.
I'm not sure I'm impressed by the usefulness of this test. I don't think a 40-year-old who gets the same number of answers correct as I do has a higher IQ than me, but the way it is adjusted for age says that they do. Perhaps this is standard, but it seems ridiculous to me. There should be no loss of cognitive functioning at so young an age as 40, should there? If the person was 60, maybe even 50, it would make more sense to me. Also, the maximum score (100% correct answers) is only 140. All that said, I'm not sure I put much faith in the IQ thing, anyway - unless one includes scores on a variety of intelligence types.
It was fun, though. I enjoy patterns and puzzle-solving. I'd love to take a harder version. I only found two of those questions challenging (though I apparently got one wrong when confident I'd gotten it right).
_________________
"A flower falls, even though we love it; and a weed grows, even though we do not love it."