Emotion Management - Info from Attwood conference

Page 6 of 16 [ 243 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 16  Next

Zonder
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,081
Location: Sitting on my sofa.

22 May 2008, 4:45 am

shopaholic wrote:
I am talking about expressing, as opposed to suppressing/concealing, an emotion, not causing harm to or manipulating others.


That is a fine line, and under emotional duress, unmanaged emotions can quickly turn to harm and manipulation. I agree that suppressing and concealing emotions is a bad thing - a self-destructive thing. Learning how ones emotions manifest themselves and learning to constructively manage them is, I believe, different than suppression.

Z



shopaholic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 594
Location: UK

22 May 2008, 4:57 am

I agree - the former is a desirable outcome, the latter is not.

Doesn't answer my main point though about why NT's find emotional openness so uncomfortable/socially unacceptable!



Zonder
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,081
Location: Sitting on my sofa.

22 May 2008, 5:44 am

shopaholic wrote:
I agree - the former is a desirable outcome, the latter is not.

Doesn't answer my main point though about why NT's find emotional openness so uncomfortable/socially unacceptable!


That is really hard to answer - because none of us can really know what is going on in someone else's head. From what I've observed of how people react to those I think might have ASDs (it's hard for me to understand why/how pepole react to me), it seems on at least one level to be a matter of bluntness. NTs often (but not always) put on a mask of niceness in order to make it through social interaction or to get their way. Those with an ASD are often blunt - say what's on their mind, etc. Each way of dealing with emotionally-charged content is not understood by the other and subsequently the other way is viewed as being wrong, or creepy, or whatever.

Before I knew about ASDs, I had a friend who pretty much had no filter on what he said, and when he became emotionally aroused, he became more obnoxious. He was great one-on-one, but when he was around even one or two other people, what he said made him appear to be more and more insensitive and mean-spirited. He had no idea why people reacted badly to him or why he lost friends and he seemed to be increasingly angry with others and frustrated with himself. I observed how people reacted to him, and, as sad as it is to say, loosing friends was his own fault, but he had no idea what was going on. I wonder, if he had had some help to understand and manage his emotions, that he would have been less angry with people (NT and Aspie) and less frustrated with himself.

Z



chesapeaker
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 106
Location: USA - upper Midwest

22 May 2008, 7:59 am

little-bird wrote:
I guess some people have had bad experiences with CBT, or it just doesn't work with them. But I don't understand why some of you are so quick to brush it off. I think that these 'tools' can be useful. I suppose it depends upon how one implements CBT into their life, but I don't see it as having to be followed like it's a 24hr step by step guide to living and becoming a 'better', well-adjusted person. F#@k that. I agree, be yourself. But as I see it, these tools are to help you when you need them. Like it says - emotional management. Perhaps we should add in brackets (For Times of Crisis).

For example there are times when an aspie might want to do relatively simple things like see a doctor, go to an interview, go to the pharmacy, get groceries, go to family social events - things that will cause a lot of stress etc. I can appreciate that some of these tools would be helpful to get a handle of your emotions in these situations. It isn't like you'd want to turn yourself into some other person, it is that you want to be able to do things, achieve some little things, and share your life with friends and family, in a way that is not as stressful, painful, bewildering etc for yourself and others.

Certainly, if someone tells you that you can totally turn your life around or become a new person 'cured' of your aspieness if you follow a strict CBT regimen, then I think you are being misguided by someone who, while they may mean well, lacks insight into the breadth of humanity.



CBT DOES WORK. I think the reason it seems to be brushed off here, is it directly confronts a person's position at staying a "victim". What I have seen about myself, and many folks who really need it, they have a lot of anger about being mistreated and such, and that anger keeps you highly invested in being a victim. Whining, blaming and complaining about how everybody and anybody and anything has done you wrong, keeps you from getting a life. Getting a life is scary. As smart, IQ wise, some people are, they are terrified of life itself. I have struggled with this for years. I am constantly learning. But I don't blame anybody anymore, and even myself. I just factor in the fact nobody's perfect, and keep trying. Thank you CBT for giving me a life and getting me out of all that energy I wasted on being angry, indignant and depressed. The cost of not having love and fun is too high. Besides I've gotten used to living with egg on my face, it is a good sun block. (That's a joke Aspies)



chesapeaker
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 106
Location: USA - upper Midwest

22 May 2008, 8:04 am

I was introduced to CBT by a clinical psychologist who had me read and apply Aaron Beck's book. Can't remember the name of the book. But plug in a search for CBT and Beck and you will find all kinds of stuff. You have to sit down with pencil and paper while you read it and do the WORK. You cannot do it in a day. It took me days to read and do the work. Then it took me years to apply my knowledge and work through all the "wrongs" and my locked in behavior that kept me depressed. I was 53 at the time. I am 60 now and have a life. Thank you CBT for not going to my grave pissed off and a victim and depressed. I train dogs and ride horses and help people do taxes and form corporations. I could never do that if I was this old and using all my energy on being pissed off at crazy stuff irrelevant stuff.

SO, GET THE BOOK DO THE WORK IF YOU WANT A BETTER LIFE. IF NOT, THAT'S OKAY BUT I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU UNTIL YOU DO.



chesapeaker
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 106
Location: USA - upper Midwest

22 May 2008, 8:07 am

One other thing. I was on Wellbutrin & Cymbalta for years. I was very suicidal all the time. I weaned myself off 2 months ago. It was hell. Worse than getting off what I have seen in movies of heroin. But, I am feeling great and not depressed. I was on those drugs from 2001 until 2008. I think they don't work but make depression worse over the long run. Now, I do not have bipolar, or mania. In fact, I could sleep all the time when I am depressed. I have what they call Atypical Depression. They have found CBT works very well on this type of depression.



chesapeaker
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 106
Location: USA - upper Midwest

22 May 2008, 8:12 am

In fact, I find it very humorous, how some folks on this forum are so STUCK into blaming NT's for everything. Talk about a victim mode. So, if you are in doubt whether CBT will help you take this little quiz:

Have you chronically pissed off and angry at: yes no
your spouse/exspouse
your mother
your father
god
church/religion
a political party
anything

If you answered yes to anyone or more. Get the book, you are stuck



ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

22 May 2008, 9:58 am

chesapeaker wrote:
You have to sit down with pencil and paper while you read it and do the WORK. You cannot do it in a day. It took me days to read and do the work. Then it took me years to apply my knowledge and work through all the "wrongs" and my locked in behavior that kept me depressed. I was 53 at the time. I am 60 now and have a life. Thank you CBT for not going to my grave pissed off and a victim and depressed. I train dogs and ride horses and help people do taxes and form corporations. GET THE BOOK DO THE WORK IF YOU WANT A BETTER LIFE. IF NOT, THAT'S OKAY BUT I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU UNTIL YOU DO.


chesapeaker wrote:
I was on Wellbutrin and Cymbalta for years. I was very suicidal all the time . I weaned myself off 2 months ago. It was hell. Worse than getting off what I have seen in movies of heroin. But, i am feeling great and not depressed. I was on those drugs from 2001 until 2008. I think they don't work but make depression worse over the long run. I have what they call Atypical Depression. They have found CBT works very well on this type of depression.

I am not quite clear what state you were in for the last seven years: "Suicidal all the time, your depression worse over the long run." or feeling better and better as a result of using CBT?

This is the kind of self-contradicting argument I used for 7-8 years too to convince myself that my life was far better for CBT.

I also think it is very important to distinguish between "an attachment to victim drama", ( which "label" is as unpleasant as any old ones, and is used a lot by CBT fans, and seems to forget about vast numbers of people who are disabled by real things in life), and AS style need for head-clearing understanding/reasons for things.

And CBT, the belief that a "you" independent in some way of the rest of you can make you think and feel a certain way is a pleasant/intoxicating illusion/delusion it takes/took me many hours of work to maintain, and cost me in clarity.

:study:



sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

22 May 2008, 11:03 am

shopaholic wrote:
I have a right to react any way I want - what harm does it do?


all depends on what you do when you react, of course



chesapeaker
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 106
Location: USA - upper Midwest

22 May 2008, 11:21 am

ouinon wrote:
chesapeaker wrote:
You have to sit down with pencil and paper while you read it and do the WORK. You cannot do it in a day. It took me days to read and do the work. Then it took me years to apply my knowledge and work through all the "wrongs" and my locked in behavior that kept me depressed. I was 53 at the time. I am 60 now and have a life. Thank you CBT for not going to my grave pissed off and a victim and depressed. I train dogs and ride horses and help people do taxes and form corporations. GET THE BOOK DO THE WORK IF YOU WANT A BETTER LIFE. IF NOT, THAT'S OKAY BUT I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU UNTIL YOU DO.


chesapeaker wrote:
I was on Wellbutrin and Cymbalta for years. I was very suicidal all the time . I weaned myself off 2 months ago. It was hell. Worse than getting off what I have seen in movies of heroin. But, i am feeling great and not depressed. I was on those drugs from 2001 until 2008. I think they don't work but make depression worse over the long run. I have what they call Atypical Depression. They have found CBT works very well on this type of depression.

I am not quite clear what state you were in for the last seven years: "Suicidal all the time, your depression worse over the long run." or feeling better and better as a result of using CBT?

This is the kind of self-contradicting argument I used for 7-8 years too to convince myself that my life was far better for CBT.

I also think it is very important to distinguish between "an attachment to victim drama", ( which "label" is as unpleasant as any old ones, and is used a lot by CBT fans, and seems to forget about vast numbers of people who are disabled by real things in life), and AS style need for head-clearing understanding/reasons for things.

And CBT, the belief that a "you" independent in some way of the rest of you can make you think and feel a certain way is a pleasant/intoxicating illusion/delusion it takes/took me many hours of work to maintain, and cost me in clarity.

It is a long story, of course. But the point is I was trying to make, and not clear about. I trusted my doctors, and they kept giving me the pills. I got better with the CBT but was still very depressed. I stopped taking the pills and the depression cleared. Sometimes you can be over medicated, and I was. The medication was causing the suicidal ideation. It is very difficult to know what is going on. The fact that I am not bipolar is very important. I think CBT can help people, but some need meds, and some it is detrimental. If you have the type of depression I have, the meds make it worse. The CBT makes it much better. CBT works no matter what. But you have to balance. CBT is not an instant cure or cure at all. It is a management too. My point was that it took me years to figure this out. Each is unique. But CBT is good regardless. I think it would help Aspie a lot because they are so logical. If they can learn to evaluate logically what is going on, they can have a less conflicting chaotic life.

:study:



krex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Age: 62
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 4,471
Location: Minnesota

22 May 2008, 2:03 pm

Some thoughts on emotional expression.....

I don't think this is a clear cut NT vs AS thing. If you have ever been around people from different cultures you can observe that humans express emotions in very different ways and what is excepted or expected changes with cultures. I come from a very emotionally "restrained" family in a country that seems to promote emotional restraint..."stay cool"=power. I observe some of the emotional displays of people who were raised in some other cultures as being really intense. I think this is also seen in different socio-economic groups of people. Each has their own idea of what is the appropriate level of emotional display and each finds the alternative display to be "odd/wrong/other"<----those are value judgements.

When I was growing up I was constantly criticised for not showing the "right" amount of positive emotions. I did not smile "enough" or show enough gratitude when someone did something for me or gave me something...I don't gush well. I still can't and when others do it, it feels "wrong" to me, fake, because it's not part of my communication style. When I am angry and having an emotional or sensory induced meltdown...it scares some people. I believe for many, that is a normal physiological reaction to "others anger". It kicks adrenaline into their bodies and creates a fight or flight sensation...something that is not often possible, (we can't run away during our jobs or punch a customer in the nose). Maybe a factor of NT's having a higher then "our normal" mirror neurons ? I know I have observed NT's responding much more intensely to emotional expression by others then I do. Perhaps that is their disability? For me to react to someones negative emotions they have to be expressing them very strongly...when someone is screaming at me, I do respond with fight or flight.


I do think it's odd that aspies are labeled as "unemotional robots" and then criticized for over-reacting. It is obvious that persons who claim this are simply lacking "aspie theory of mind" and unaware that my reactions are based on a different level of senses. I am reacting to stimuli that they are not even aware exist,(because they base sense on their own experience of them).
I do think that if I am willing to learn how to understand their responses they have an equal obligation to understand and except mine as "real" even if they don't feel the same senses. NT's are not my role models. I see many things about society that are highly dysfunctional and I never except anything based solely on how others tell me to act/feel/think...it's not in my nature. On the flip-side, I don't want to reject something just because NT's do it that way. I want to examine each objective and judge it based on it's value to me. That is how I view CBT/RET. What part of it work for me and what doesn't. When it is taken as a form of religion then it can be as destructive as any religion that is not examined with a critical/rational mind. I don't DO "faith", I do logic.


So that is my approach to emotional expression. It is meant, to me, to communicate to myself and others. Internally it helps guide me to realize that I need to think about something. Why am I feeling this and is it helpful to me to feel this way? Sometimes it is...to react dispels some of the unpleasant energy. Then I decide if I should react by throwing something or changing something in my environment,(usually there are more options then that :wink: ). To have my emotions control me, seems very counter-productive to my own well-being. Sometimes reacting gives my power and energy to the person who is intentionally trying to provoke such a reaction...that isn't in my best interest. I don't like being manipulated and I am the only one who can stop them from achieving that goal...by not responding, (drives them nuts :lol: ). So learning how to monitor and express my emotions as I chose, is not to appease NT's it is for my advantage and psychological well being.


For me CBT isn't about controling your emotions or thoughts so that they are socially exceptable but understanding them so that I am not controlled by them. That can sometimes be achieved by changing the way I focus my thoughts not changing them to reflect something I know to be false. I think some of peoples bad experiences with CBT is from having very stuipid therapist who treat it as a religion or a form of self-hypnosis. People who have experienced some relief from self defeating behavior or thinking focus are lucky to have had an intelligent therapist<---statisticaly rare, I think.


_________________
Just because one plane is flying out of formation, doesn't mean the formation is on course....R.D.Lang

Visit my wool sculpture blog
http://eyesoftime.blogspot.com/


chesapeaker
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 106
Location: USA - upper Midwest

22 May 2008, 6:39 pm

krex wrote:
Some thoughts on emotional expression.....

I don't think this is a clear cut NT vs AS thing. If you have ever been around people from different cultures you can observe that humans express emotions in very different ways and what is excepted or expected changes with cultures. I come from a very emotionally "restrained" family in a country that seems to promote emotional restraint..."stay cool"=power. I observe some of the emotional displays of people who were raised in some other cultures as being really intense. I think this is also seen in different socio-economic groups of people. Each has their own idea of what is the appropriate level of emotional display and each finds the alternative display to be "odd/wrong/other"<----those are value judgements.

When I was growing up I was constantly criticised for not showing the "right" amount of positive emotions. I did not smile "enough" or show enough gratitude when someone did something for me or gave me something...I don't gush well. I still can't and when others do it, it feels "wrong" to me, fake, because it's not part of my communication style. When I am angry and having an emotional or sensory induced meltdown...it scares some people. I believe for many, that is a normal physiological reaction to "others anger". It kicks adrenaline into their bodies and creates a fight or flight sensation...something that is not often possible, (we can't run away during our jobs or punch a customer in the nose). Maybe a factor of NT's having a higher then "our normal" mirror neurons ? I know I have observed NT's responding much more intensely to emotional expression by others then I do. Perhaps that is their disability? For me to react to someones negative emotions they have to be expressing them very strongly...when someone is screaming at me, I do respond with fight or flight.


I do think it's odd that aspies are labeled as "unemotional robots" and then criticized for over-reacting. It is obvious that persons who claim this are simply lacking "aspie theory of mind" and unaware that my reactions are based on a different level of senses. I am reacting to stimuli that they are not even aware exist,(because they base sense on their own experience of them).
I do think that if I am willing to learn how to understand their responses they have an equal obligation to understand and except mine as "real" even if they don't feel the same senses. NT's are not my role models. I see many things about society that are highly dysfunctional and I never except anything based solely on how others tell me to act/feel/think...it's not in my nature. On the flip-side, I don't want to reject something just because NT's do it that way. I want to examine each objective and judge it based on it's value to me. That is how I view CBT/RET. What part of it work for me and what doesn't. When it is taken as a form of religion then it can be as destructive as any religion that is not examined with a critical/rational mind. I don't DO "faith", I do logic.


So that is my approach to emotional expression. It is meant, to me, to communicate to myself and others. Internally it helps guide me to realize that I need to think about something. Why am I feeling this and is it helpful to me to feel this way? Sometimes it is...to react dispels some of the unpleasant energy. Then I decide if I should react by throwing something or changing something in my environment,(usually there are more options then that :wink: ). To have my emotions control me, seems very counter-productive to my own well-being. Sometimes reacting gives my power and energy to the person who is intentionally trying to provoke such a reaction...that isn't in my best interest. I don't like being manipulated and I am the only one who can stop them from achieving that goal...by not responding, (drives them nuts :lol: ). So learning how to monitor and express my emotions as I chose, is not to appease NT's it is for my advantage and psychological well being.


For me CBT isn't about controling your emotions or thoughts so that they are socially exceptable but understanding them so that I am not controlled by them. That can sometimes be achieved by changing the way I focus my thoughts not changing them to reflect something I know to be false. I think some of peoples bad experiences with CBT is from having very stuipid therapist who treat it as a religion or a form of self-hypnosis. People who have experienced some relief from self defeating behavior or thinking focus are lucky to have had an intelligent therapist<---statisticaly rare, I think.



You definitely GET what CBT is all about.



asplanet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,258
Location: Cyberspace, New Zealand

22 May 2008, 8:15 pm

krex I agree with chesapeaker "You definitely GET what CBT is all about" and very well explained.

I have no problem with any sort of treatment if really needed, but it does seem that when ever a child is diagnosed like my son your told they need all sorts of treatments as a matter of course, I know my son does not need, he is very happy and proud to be who is.

But for some reason the professionals do not quite get that some of us really are ok and I know so many adult have been damaged by being alienated from society, which wares them down and then wants them to pay to become more of a carbon cut out of a typical nt.

I see parents saying to there children "why cannot you be like the other children", "your a real pain", "your so fussy" and how cruel other nt children can be, often these children's difference can make them seem awkward to other children, the coordination difference can cause so many problems sport wise, I can remember many times all the other children laughing at me because I had no balance etc.. who needs to be trained!

The real problem with any sort of training it is often carried out by NTs who do not fully understand the issue themselves... finding the right professional is like finding a needle in a hay stack, would you want to take that risk with your child!

I feel the treatment should only be suggested if your child is having problems, otherwise it would be all to easy to give your child treatment really is not needed, and sometimes I really do wonder who the treatment is for, as the asperger child is often very intelligent.

And in my opinion one of the only experts worth hearing on the subject who as far as I know is not on the autism spectrum is in fact Tony Attwood, but we cannot all see him:
Seminars by autism expert - Friday 23 May, 2008 12:01am
ELOURA Blue Mountains Disability Services will host autism and Asperger's specialist Prof Tony Attwood on 18 & 19 June at the St Marys Band Club. Prof Attwood will cover topics such as the origins of special interests in Asperger's syndrome and constructive strategies to use or reduce the dominance of special interests, challenging behaviours, strategies to reduce bullying and increase social inclusion for people with Asperger's syndrome and autism, and issues for adolescents with Asperger's. Prof Attwood's seminars will be held from 9.30am to 4.30pm each day. Tickets: $85 a day including catering. Registration and details: www.eloura.com.au or 4751 5266.

I am not against people learning from good resources and good information, unfortunatelly far to many bad and fad treatments about...

I would also like to add I do not think its a aspie/nt thing as there are some wonderful nt parents who truly embrace there children, I have a wonderful nt son... but unfortunately there are far to many people on and off the autism spectrum who still seem to think autism is an illness, to me its just a difference if not hugely misunderstood.


_________________
Face Book "Alyson Fiona Bradley "


Danielismyname
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,565

23 May 2008, 4:27 am

Zonder wrote:
As soon as HAD gets a website going, I'm sending it to a few people I know!


Here's an excerpt from the paper I'm going to submit to those working on the DSM-V:

Quote:
A proposal for a human affective disorder -- its neglect by science, its course, and its treatment

by Daniel, A.S.D, O.C.D

Preface:

I will preface this paper first by stating my disapproval at my scientific peers, and their utter negligence in overlooking the most severe developmental disability that has plagued [Wom]mankind since its dawn.


Introduction:

The parents of humanity, Prometheus and Pandora created this disorder as they decided to play parents--which of note, was entirely irrational as neither were of a sound mind state to create and nurture life to responsible adults (a trickster of mythical proportions who also happened to be a thief, and the individual that created evil and held hope from humanity for life). Due to their innate flaws induced by their severe developmental disabilities--Human Affective Disorder (HAD), they created life that was as equally disturbed as they were. It has been proven that HAD is a genetic disorder that is passed on to one's offspring in all cases--there is no known cure [but death]. Prometheus and Pandora both displayed the impairments of HAD--a marked lack of respect for others and their genuine wellbeing, an extreme level of egocentricity, a severe impairment in rational thinking, antisocial behaviours (up to, and including murder of others), extreme selfishness, a lack of honesty; an extreme amount of dishonesty, a lack of rational thought at all times, emotional disturbances that manifest as a severe and marked level of self-centeredness; these are but a few of the major symptoms of HAD, and the parents of humanity both fit Daniel's Criteria for HAD.* These symptoms promote massive amounts of distress on those emotionally attached to the individual with HAD--insofar that those attached display the same symptoms at a level of severity as the individual affected. Of important note, and I will expand upon this under the section titled Treatment, when the individual with HAD is removed from those who care for him or her (HAD affects women and men in equal numbers), we've noted a marked decrease in the severity of symptomology, by the individual with HAD, and those who show affective HAD. Solitary confinement; social and emotional withdrawal is the current form of treatment, and it is very effective in managing the disease.



Zonder
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,081
Location: Sitting on my sofa.

23 May 2008, 4:33 am

Danielismyname wrote:
Zonder wrote:
As soon as HAD gets a website going, I'm sending it to a few people I know!


Here's an excerpt from the paper I'm going to submit to those working on the DSM-V:

Quote:
A proposal for a human affective disorder -- its neglect by science, its course, and its treatment

by Daniel, A.S.D, O.C.D

Preface:

I will preface this paper first by stating my disapproval at my scientific peers, and their utter negligence in overlooking the most severe developmental disability that has plagued [Wom]mankind since its dawn.


Introduction:

The parents of humanity, Prometheus and Pandora created this disorder as they decided to play parents--which of note, was entirely irrational as neither were of a sound mind state to create and nurture life to responsible adults (a trickster of mythical proportions who also happened to be a thief, and the individual that created evil and held hope from humanity for life). Due to their innate flaws induced by their severe developmental disabilities--Human Affective Disorder (HAD), they created life that was as equally disturbed as they were. It has been proven that HAD is a genetic disorder that is passed on to one's offspring in all cases--there is no known cure [but death]. Prometheus and Pandora both displayed the impairments of HAD--a marked lack of respect for others and their genuine wellbeing, an extreme level of egocentricity, a severe impairment in rational thinking, antisocial behaviours (up to, and including murder of others), extreme selfishness, a lack of honesty; an extreme amount of dishonesty, a lack of rational thought at all times, emotional disturbances that manifest as a severe and marked level of self-centeredness; these are but a few of the major symptoms of HAD, and the parents of humanity both fit Daniel's Criteria for HAD.* These symptoms promote massive amounts of distress on those emotionally attached to the individual with HAD--insofar that those attached display the same symptoms at a level of severity as the individual affected. Of important note, and I will expand upon this under the section titled Treatment, when the individual with HAD is removed from those who care for him or her (HAD affects women and men in equal numbers), we've noted a marked decrease in the severity of symptomology, by the individual with HAD, and those who show affective HAD. Solitary confinement; social and emotional withdrawal is the current form of treatment, and it is very effective in managing the disease.


Dang, Daniel, that's beautiful! You're really good at satyre! An alternate DSM-V would be hilarious!

Z



shopaholic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 594
Location: UK

23 May 2008, 5:57 am

Krex, that was a really well-balanced & helpful contribution, thanks!

To clarify - for me, it is certainly not about "wanting to stay in victim mode."

Rather, I can best describe my problem as an inner war between a desire not to unintentionally hurt others by my behaviour versus a refusal to "sell out" who I am and become fake.

i.e. I want to continue behaving the way I naturally behave, but I do not want others to feel hurt as a result of my doing so.

This is why I need to understand why I am making the NT's uncomfortable, so I can better judge whether it is me or them who are being unreasonable.

The "Social Story" quote that I cited was the only thing about the CBT I actually had an issue with - to me it just looked like a kind of brainwashing!! !! !!

i.e. we were being "programmed" to accept a totally alien concept (to an Aspie), however "obvious" it may appear to an NT.

I hope that has clarified what I was trying to say.

Oh, & Sinsboldy asked "what do I do when I react?"

I was referring here to minor but frequent irritations such as the printer not working (again!), the lift stopping at every single floor when I am in a hurry, the train being canceled etc.

I would react by sighing loudly & expressively, complaining to anyone who happened to be nearby whether I knew them or not, saying "GRRRRRRR!! ! For God's sake, this is ridiculous! !! !" to no-one in particular, and if I was really angry, maybe stamping my foot with frustration.

Who is that hurting? Nobody!

Is it frowned upon by NT's? Most definitely!