Neurotypicals are happier than people with AS
It's trite because it can't be backed up. It doesn't logically follow that happiness is a choice just because it's a state of mind. Physical pain is also a state of mind but I bet you can't hold your hand on the stove and choose not to feel pain.
very wetsern and middle class way to think - this happiness is a choice idea. It's a but too indulgently New Age for me. (the horrors of Louise Hay.....yikes.)
I personally believe i can implement this choice to some degree, but i am in the luxurious position of doing so by virtue of my cushy little life in Australia's subtropical east coast region... roof over head, education, water, blah blah blah.
Ask a starving kid in Darfur or its mother and i am sure the answer will be somewhat different.
A few families in Sierra Leone may also beg to differ with this line of thinking too.
Actually its very much an eastern philosophy. A core tenet of buddhism is that desire brings suffering. To be forever thinking that "When I get ..... I'll be happier" is fatal because happiness is a state that can't be attained by outside sources.
I reiterate; it has nothing to do with getting what you want, but appreciating what you have. I got hit by a car last week; knocked off my bike, bounced off the windshield then landed on the road. I walked away, and I've spent the last week in shock and awe at that. I absolutely appreciate how hard depression is to deal with - I have been there and done that, but there's nothing like a near death/serious injury incident to make you appreciate being able to live and breathe.
CMaximus
Deinonychus
Joined: 3 Nov 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 387
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada, Earth
It's trite because it can't be backed up. It doesn't logically follow that happiness is a choice just because it's a state of mind. Physical pain is also a state of mind but I bet you can't hold your hand on the stove and choose not to feel pain.
very wetsern and middle class way to think - this happiness is a choice idea. It's a but too indulgently New Age for me. (the horrors of Louise Hay.....yikes.)
I personally believe i can implement this choice to some degree, but i am in the luxurious position of doing so by virtue of my cushy little life in Australia's subtropical east coast region... roof over head, education, water, blah blah blah.
Ask a starving kid in Darfur or its mother and i am sure the answer will be somewhat different.
A few families in Sierra Leone may also beg to differ with this line of thinking too.
Actually its very much an eastern philosophy. A core tenet of buddhism is that desire brings suffering. To be forever thinking that "When I get ..... I'll be happier" is fatal because happiness is a state that can't be attained by outside sources.
I absolutely agree that happiness can't always be attained by outside sources. However for me not having desires is equally fatal. The idea that happiness is relative isn't a comforting one to me. If I'm feeling particularly empty and I can't find any external cause for the pain then this realization only draws me deeper into despair. Sometimes I really do want to appreciate what I have, believe me I do, but I just can't. I'm starting to believe I have a form of bi-polar disorder though so I'm not sure this trait of mine has as much to do with autism as it had to do with strong chemical imbalances that occur.
I'm happy to hear that you're still here with us and hopefully recovering.
I had never believed in this, but this week I spent a couple days in hospital due to an eye operation and, though I've had a life (and especially the last year) from hell, I learned to appreciate my luck when Í passed so many people who were talking on their cells at the hospital. GOOD LORD, those conversations reminded me how much worse off I could be. The one I remember most vividly was the last one, as I was going to the bus stop to wait for my bus home: "...and she said that next week, hopefully, we'll know if it's an infection or a tumor, if there's no strike at the hospital."
_________________
So-called white lies are like fake jewelry. Adorn yourself with them if you must, but expect to look cheap to a connoisseur.
It's useless to rate any one group of people as happier or not happier.
Let's say an autistic person has a loving, supportive, family. Let's say a 'neurotypical' person has a dysfunctional family full of alcoholics and abusers. The Autistic person is not going to be miserable simply because he or she is autistic. The Neurotypical person is not going to be happy go-lucky simply because he or she is Neurotypical.
Happiness is not the disorder or lack of disorder. Happiness is not about identifying with one social/disability group over the other. Happiness is not about holding one set of political beliefs or not holding another. Happiness is circumstantial and it seems to be based on the people in your life. To say the the so-called neurotypical people are all happy is just as much of a generalization as saying all autistic people are sad, or that one group is more happy/sad than the other. And that opens the door for more stigma and views as us the autistics as bigots. Do we honestly need that with all the doom and gloom swirling around about us? ![]()
I don't know if that is true. NT's just are good at faking their happiness by smiling and appearing more sociable. I, like many "NT's" (kind of - ADHD, sensory issues and nonverbal problems) act all social in groups but can't wait to leave. My husband who is undx on the spectrum didn't mind staying at our wedding for a longer time. I needed to leave.
A lot of NT's feel the need to act more happy where as a lot of people on the spectrum don't feel the need to fake it. That actually makes some NT's unhappy because they feel like they do need to fake it. I personally can't stand the question "How are you." I used to be honest but found that most other NT's don't know how to respond to honestly. Again, this is a huge stereotypical response.
NTs are sheople, they are robots, they are shallow, etc. But the bottom line is that they are happier than people with AS.
Is there anything is nothing more important than being happy?
All the NT bashing on this board doesn't really make a lot of sense.
I don't think anyone is truly happy regardless of if they have AS or not. Everyone faces individual challenges in life & it doesn't matter what those challenges are, they can make that person miserable.
Challenges don't make people happy or sad; it's how people deal with those challenges mentally that decide it. It's one's own choice to be happy or sad about how something turns out. Basically, you take something as you chose to take it.
For instance, seeing all the "woe is me" crap on these forums gets me discouraged every time I try to help...but at the same time, no one is telling me to get discouraged; it's my choice. I could just go ahead and say "to #e!! with 'em all", but I don't...and that's my choice entirely. It's also my choice, entirely, to attempt to inspire everyone. I can see how well it works overall, but no one is forcing me to continue to try.
I have basically said it in regards overall to social interaction, and have no major qualms about it.
Your confusing the notion of those who find meaning in being vs those who find meaning in becoming.
To some the highest ideal of life is striving to develop all skills essentially(if one could do it for eternity), would lead to omniscience.
In otherwords, becoming matters. As a result, this idea of finding happiness in what you see around you will mean little to nothing to such a person. That argument only works for those who are depressed and find meaning in the state of identity of self or being they are in.
richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351
Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind
I'm happy to hear that you're still here with us and hopefully recovering.
Thank you, I appreciate that. All I had was bruises, thankfully.
Some advice that helped me was to try and separate yourself from your thoughts. Meditation is ideal, but any state can work. Our minds are far too active, and if you learn to observe it, you start to see that it makes its own problems far worse than they need to be. You are not your mind, and if you can find the level inside yourself thats below it, I promise you'll be happier.
I'm going to challenge the core assumption of this thread which is that happiness is a static state that people either have or don't have.
I don't think it is.
I think happiness is very fluid and is a mental state that everybody feels sometimes and doesn't feel at other times. It is even possible to be both happy and unhappy simultaneously, a state called bittersweet happiness.
Happiness isn't something that people are or aren't. It is a temporary state of mind and it means different things to different people.
CockneyRebel
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 121,179
Location: In my own little country
Wow! I was looking back at my posts on this thread. I've said some pretty bad things about NTs and mainstream society. That was me as a Punk, though. Now that I'm back to the real CockneyRebel who likes the 60s, I regret the things that I've said, and I wish that I could take it all back. Not all NTs are bad, there is no one group that's happier than the other, and I'm more a part of the mainstream than I was before, but in a Mid-60s sort of way. Bad bad bad. If I only knew that I was going to get back to being the real me, I would have thought before I posted. Words are like toothpaste out of a tube. Once they come out, you can't put them back in.
_________________
The Family Schlager
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Are there a lot of crazy people in this world? |
Yesterday, 4:07 pm |
| Why are people questioning my ability to consent to sex? |
10 Jul 2026, 2:11 pm |
