The phrase "archaic, illogical, semi-random gobbledygook" makes me smile.
Grey_Area wrote:
"The exception that proves the rule". Nothing about that sentence makes sense to me. How does an exception prove a rule?
I think it's just a jumble of words that idiots use to try and "win" the "argument" when someone points out an error in whatever fallacious crap they were spouting.
I've found that the best response when someone says it to me is to ask them exactly how an exception can prove a rule. To date, I have never received a coherent answer.
Usually it is just a fallacious mode of argumentation, yeah. Essentially saying "Well, my idea is wrong, so therefore it's actually right."
The original meaning of the phrase is different - I looked it up. Originally it meant that the fact that an exception exists implies the existence of some general rule.
Moog wrote:
I guess not all the tools in the shed are sharp ones. Why can't people be more specific, gabnabbit.
Perhaps you prefer the other variants of this phrase, like "Not the sharpest knife in the drawer?"
Or "...the brightest crayon in the box?"
For your amusement, here's a whole list of them:
http://dan.hersam.com/lists/not_bright.html