Hi Verdandi,
If the Asperger's Syndrome is genetic, "EVERY celluar PART of a person with the Syndrome IS the product of the Asperger's Syndrome".
Asperger's is correlated with gifted or higher IQ, to the extent that without artificial abstract constructs, it is next to impossible to differentiate a "gifted child" from the "gifted Asperger's Syndrome child" using empirical evidence (the hard science empirical evidence reveals no differences). The Law of Variances comes into play because of the greater expanse of standard deviations of Asperger's IQs, where with Binet's tests, very high IQs are disproportionately identified with Asperger's (Ioan James' book speculates this too, with many (20) (to most?) top famous geniuses). Gifted merges are at:
http://www.davidsongifted.org/db/Articles_id_10167.aspx and
http://www.homeschooldiner.com/specials ... rs_2E.html An older paper (but not old enough to avoid DSM-IV) on "Validity and Neuropsychological Characterization of Asperger Syndrome" that's being "defined away" is at:
http://www.aspaonline.net/upload/Validi ... 5B1%5D.pdf with
http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/IQtable.aspxOlder references are sometimes more available through Ngrams:
http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?cont ... moothing=3The State Rehab told me I was too disabled for rehab services, the Federal courts told me I wasn't disabled enough under the Rehab Act/ADA, and the U.S. Supreme Court finds it humorously, and probably criminal without exonerating evidence, that a person can be SSDI/SSI disabled by statutory guidelines, yet claim to be otherwise quailified for gainful activities with reasonable accommodation. The self-contradictory burden and negative prejudice is placed on the ADA protected individual by the institutions doing the "protection". The Supreme Court told me to go to hell, but I did get my SSI, but no job and no rehab because of the Catch-22 of my being in the top 3% of the top 25%, and in the bottom 3% of the bottom 10%.
I like the satirical "suck it up" cartoon at:
http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2010/ ... nimgC.html and the obit:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/28/arts/ ... lahan.html Hi OldManTime,
Could you explain your viewpoint on IQ BS to the Federal judge who just deprived you of a good job because your higher than normal IQ "disqualified" you (125 versus 104)???
http://www.thisistrue.com/to_protect_an ... _6657.html and
http://nyletterpress.wordpress.com/2008 ... telligent/The "juicy details" you missed is in your induction that is like, since a person's heart has been beating since the start of life, their heart will beat forever, if they don't give in and let it stop. Only the two "Yes" and "No" distinctions gives the question: "If you visit Lake Disappointment in Australia to verify your firm belief that it is the world's most aptly named landmark, will you be disappointed?", or Smullyan's citation of "Will you answer no to this question?"
http://books.google.com/books?id=9SyyUO ... se&f=falseIt happens with government agencies also, in fact, it gave birth to "Catch-22" by Joseph Heller. The judges often determine who gets the money.
actually, genes are effected by environment. a certain genetic code may function just find with the right environmental input. also, there's the whole epigenetics thing that i don't really understand.
also, can you explain your post here? i haven't kept up with the thread and don't understand your post fully.