B19 wrote:
This is as far away from CBT, philosophically, as it is possible to be, the polar opposite. CBT, like all behaviourist theories, is based on the goal of the practitioner being able to predict and control the behaviour of others, and ignores completely any notion of human conscieousness as a dynamic and essential human function. No matter how you may try to dress it up, this remains true of behaviourist approaches. This is why the founding father of behaviourism (B F Skinner) entitled his book "Beyond Freedom and Dignity". He didn't believe that these values were important to humans, as in his own view, they were just delusionary anyway. In Skinner's view, people were basically input-output robots, they could be programmed by his 'operant conditioning'.
Personally, I think that there are philosophical links to be drawn between Skinner and L Ron Hubbard - they both founded cults based on dogmatic versions of "truth".
Sorry for the history lesson, however it might help place CBT in a comparative and historical framework.
Thanks for these thoughts. I have despised Skinner since first reading his ideas in High School.
I think there is a small but significant difference between Hubbard and Skinner: Hubbard knew that he was running a con. Hubbard's game grew out of his experience as a science fiction writer (as the whole Xenu thing makes abundantly clear). I think Skinner really believed in programmable people while Hubbard believed in none of the swill he was pushing.
That whole Skinnerian line was behind the worst psychiatric abuses of the CIA experiments.
Nevertheless, I think there is some good in look closely at the distorted thoughts that come with deep depression and challenging them and CBT offers a method to do that.
I think the evidence-based claim of CBT will be the undoing of the kind of abuses happening now in the UK. The evidence will show that CBT does not magically create job opertunities in an economy geared toward funnellig wealth to a tiny ruling elite.
I read a bit of William James that was too open to spiritualist nonsense and this probably unfairly colored my whole impression of his work. It is fascinating to me that so long after his explorations of these issues, we are no closer to real understanding of thought, mind and consciousness.
The huge leaps forward in understanding the somatosensory components of the nervous system are encouraging, though.