Autistics perform better than expected on intelligence test

Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 

Woodpeace
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 474
Location: Lancashire, England

22 Jun 2009, 12:34 pm

That is the finding of the recently epublished paper Enhanced visual processing contributes to matrix reasoning in autism by Isabelle Soulieres, Michelle Dawson et al. The abstract is here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19530215 .

From the abstract:

Quote:
Recent behavioral investigations have revealed that autistics perform more proficiently than non-autistics on Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (RSPM) than would be predicted by their Weschler intelligence scores. A widely-used test of fluid reasoning and intelligence, the RSPM assays abilities to flexibly infer rules, manage goal hierachies, and perform high-level absractions. [...] We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to explore the neural bases of autistics' RSPM problem solving. Fifteen autistic and eighteen non-autistic participants, matched on age, sex, manual preference and Weschler IQ, completed 60 self-paced randomly-ordered RSPM items along with a visually-similar 60-item, pattern matching comparison task. Accuracy and response times did not differ between groups in the pattern matching task. In the RSPM task, autistics performed with similar accuracy, but with shorter response times, compared to their non-autistic controls.



Almandite
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 98

22 Jun 2009, 1:59 pm

If I remember reading the article correctly, it stated that we had less activation in the prefrontal cortex, and more in visual processing areas, implying that while our visual processing may be exceptional, our high-order thinking might be below average. How does this translate into intelligence?



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

22 Jun 2009, 2:11 pm

Looks like an expansion of Dawson's earlier paper comparing autistic scores on Raven vs WAIS.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Maggiedoll
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jun 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,126
Location: Maryland

22 Jun 2009, 4:53 pm

A large part of the difference is probably that most intelligence test results are very dependent on the ability to communicate.. So most autistics scores on IQ tests just don't reflect their actual intelligence. Like they always say.. if you get a particular score on a test, all it means, is that you got that particular score on a test. IQ tests are designed to measure the intelligence of people who think in "normal" ways. If someone doesn't, it's not going to be accurate. Usually an IQ score is the average of the scores of several different types of intelligence.. if those numbers are vastly different, that average just isn't going to be very descriptive. If you score 90 in one area and 160 in another area, just averaging it and trying to use that to describe the overall intelligence is going to cause more confusion than anything else.



WoodenNickel
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 25 May 2009
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 282

23 Jun 2009, 8:28 pm

I read this when it came out when I was in Canada. The Globe and Mail had two problems. The first one I missed, but not by much. The second I did in a flash because I recognized the pattern. The point is that autistics tend to have better pattern recognition than NTs. Many have verbal disabilities that confound IQ tests. Removing the verbal content makes the test easy for many. One man who was diagnosed as mentally ret*d scored very high on this test.


_________________
"Asperge" is French for "asparagus". Therefore, I think I'm asparagus.