Two things about this stood out at me. (Well, two that I want to say something about right now.)
Quote:
One of the reasons people get away with so much lying, your research suggests, is that we are all essentially dupes. Why do we believe so many lies?
This is what I call the liar's advantage. We are not very good at detecting deception in other people. When we are trying to detect honesty, we look at the wrong kinds of nonverbal behaviors and we misinterpret them. The problem is that there is no direct correlation between someone's nonverbal behavior and their honesty. "Shiftiness" could also be the result of being nervous, angry, distracted or sad. Even trained interrogators [aren't] able to detect deception at [high] rates. You might as well flip a coin to determine if someone is being honest.
Even though the indicators people use to judge honesty aren't accurate, it totally works against aspies. What they describe as "shiftiness" is also the result of an ASD. Does that mean that a person who is not making eye contact and who is fidgeting "nervously" might actually be being MORE honest. Not to mention that being honest might make people nervous in the first place.
Quote:
What's more, a lot of the time we don't want to detect lies in other people. We are unwilling to put forward the cognitive effort to suspect the veracity of statements, and we aren't motivated to question people when they tell us things we want to hear. When we ask someone, "How are you doing?" and they say "fine," we really don't want to know what their aches and pains are. So we take "fine" at face value.
Who here is being more dishonest: the person who asks a question they don't want an answer to, or the person who gives that asker the answer that they want? I don't think that the person who is answering "fine" in this case is being dishonest, because despite the words, they haven't actually been asked how they're doing; they've been told to state that they're fine.
I always use that example of when an adult tells a kid to do something by saying "do you want to _____?" and then yells at the kid if they answer the question honestly. Does that mean that they're instructing the kid to lie by claiming that they want to do whatever it is? I don't think that's what they mean, because they don't actually think they've asked a question, even though they have. They yell because they think that the kid has refused to do something they've told them to do, rather than honestly answered a question that they asked. Bottom line:
There was no question to begin with. They're not asking for a dishonest answer to a question, they're asking for an obedient response to an order that was phrased as a question.