Prosody Changes When Discussing Interests?

Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 

Laney2005
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 147
Location: Missouri

30 Nov 2009, 12:17 pm

I know that prosody differences are often a characteristic of AS. "Robotic speech", so to speak, or incorrect tone of voice for what is being said. I am guilty of the latter more than the former. The only time I use "robotic speech" is when I get started talking about one of my "things" or when I interject (which is quite often). My eyes unfocus (I'm usually very focused on something, though probably not the eyes of the person I am speaking to!) and I become Miss Monotone for the duration of the monologue. It has taken me 26 years to realize that this happens. Does anybody else notice a change in their prosody when discussing interests, reciting facts or when interjecting?


_________________
"I don't get the facts wrong! It's everything else I screw up!"
-Flynn Carson ("The Librarian")


makuranososhi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,805
Location: Banned by Alex

30 Nov 2009, 12:30 pm

Vocally, I'm the opposite of you - when discussing my interests, I have modulation. Otherwise, I tend to mumble or speak in a low rumble that is relatively flat. However, I do tend to experience more stim-like behaviors and difficulty with eye focus when I get enthused about something dear to me.


M.


_________________
My thanks to all the wonderful members here; I will miss the opportunity to continue to learn and work with you.

For those who seek an alternative, it is coming.

So long, and thanks for all the fish!


ViperaAspis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,083
Location: Portland, OR

30 Nov 2009, 2:02 pm

I undergo a change in speaking AND writing style. I point to this Jun '09 post about D&D as a great example. I tend to revert to "excited highschooler", forget to use paragraphs (I have to edit later), throw grammar rules out the window, and liberally sprinkle in the word "dude". I have no idea why, but suspect that it is related to my interest in D&D developing during high school. It is possible that my expressions, scripts, communication style, etc all revert to the point of the interest's inception.

http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt101506.html

Don't bother with the content unless you find D&D particularly interesting. It's a bit esoteric.


_________________
Who am I? This guy! http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt97863.html


Scientist
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 Nov 2009
Age: 49
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,524
Location: The Netherlands

30 Nov 2009, 3:23 pm

Interesting topic.

I think I also use more intonation, like makuranososhi, and I think I speak a little louder, when speaking about my interests. Though I'll always use less intonation than most other (NT) people. I normally tend to speak with a soft voice and don't use much intonation.


_________________
1975, ASD: Asperger's Syndrome (diagnosed: October 22, 2009)

Interests: science, experimental psychology, psychophysics, music (listening and playing (guitar)) and visual arts

Don't focus on your weaknesses, focus on your strengths


Laney2005
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 147
Location: Missouri

30 Nov 2009, 6:45 pm

ViperaAspis wrote:
Don't bother with the content unless you find D&D particularly interesting. It's a bit esoteric.


Oh, but I do!! And I agree that 2nd Ed. is by far the best, even though I only played it with a ruthless DM... I still have a cleric trapped in a dead city because she cannot make the Strength check to open a darned sewer grate! But I will admit that all my books are 3.5 because I got them used for cheap, and I really do make up most of the rules as I go along whenever I DM. My current group of cocky 9th-level characters are about to storm the castle and try to take down a regime by themselves (ahh, meglomaniac paladins and rich-boy mages). Any ideas on how best to execute this without outright executing them?
Oh, and 3rd Ed. does use the other dice-- a little. I've been known to play barbarians with greataxes just to use the d12 for hp and damage, even though a greatsword is mathematically superior at 2d6.

Sorry. That's enough of that.


_________________
"I don't get the facts wrong! It's everything else I screw up!"
-Flynn Carson ("The Librarian")