Zac wrote:
Then Bill Gates created Windows. The graphical user interface operating system. He started the ball rolling towards anyone being able to "point and click" their way through tasks on a computer in a relatively easy manner compared to previous text-based operating systems.
Bill Gates didn't create Windows. He bought or copied a lot of it, and it took them quite a few versions of Windows to release something that didn't crash. Apple was actually the company that made the graphical user interface a viable option, and point and clicking originated from another company entirely.
Zac wrote:
He kept on pioneering with his company and created Windows 95. He marketed it incredibly well and being an astonishingly accessible, attractive and useful product most people began to buy computers.
Win95 was nice, user-wise, but it was still mostly DOS with a GUI, with some very fancy marketing and even fancier anti-competitive tactics. Also, don't forget that the first passable version of Windows (NT) was actually co-developed with IBM, until they pulled out and briefly tried their hand at it as the OS/2 operating system. Which was nice, BTW, sort of.
Oh, and M$ and Gates totally missed the Internet at first, too. Win95 didn't include any means of connecting to the Internet when it first appeared because Gates thought the www wouldn't last (he had his own version, MSN). And since we're talking about Mr Gates' visionary qualities, another one of his "visions" was that no-one would ever need more than 640k of RAM, causing DOS and Windows users headaches for nearly two decades.
Zac wrote:
That in turn drove computer prices down. The trend still continues. Every new generation of computing hardware is cheaper in real terms than the last. Value for money keeps on improving which is how palm PCs have been managed to be sold to governments in the third world.
The hardware is cheaper in spite of M$, not because of it. For example, one of their tactics is to force a copy of WIndows on users, whether they want it or not. Don't believe me? Try to order a Dell without XP. It might work, now, but if it does in the US, it's because for a while, the US government threatened to split the company if they continued with their practises. For years, it didn't work, with the result that Dell hardware cost more, not less.
Or have a look at the EU vs M$ case. Or how M$ have tried to change public standards into proprietary ones (TCP, JScript...). There are lots and lots of examples on how they've used less than admirable tactics to sell Windows and other M$ software. Do a Google search and read for yourself.