Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ] 

Aimless
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Apr 2009
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,187

23 Apr 2010, 6:14 am

This is a topic that came to mind after reading another thread; I decided to start a new one rather than get that thread slightly off topic.Do you find it almost effortless to "talk" to animals and sense what they are feeling? Why do you think it is that it is so much easier to sense an animal's wants and needs than another persons? It seems illogical but it's true for many of us. Is it because it's easier to gaze at an animal intently and thereby read subtle clues?



pensieve
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,204
Location: Sydney, Australia

23 Apr 2010, 6:22 am

I'm not sure but it's an interesting question. My guess is that animals have much more obvious body language than people do and the amount of time I spend with animals vs people, so I get used to how they think. There's also not a lot of sensory distractions like noise or other animals around us chatting wildly, like there usually are in social interactions with people.


_________________
My band photography blog - http://lostthroughthelens.wordpress.com/
My personal blog - http://helptheywantmetosocialise.wordpress.com/


Lene
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,452
Location: East China Sea

23 Apr 2010, 6:52 am

"feed me", "pet me"... it's not that hard :P

I find it is easier to tell what animals are feeling because they don't hide their emotions.



Villette
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 7 Feb 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 415

23 Apr 2010, 8:59 am

simple. an animal is of another species. great understanding is not required except for the obvious. so our understanding may be good enough. a person is of the same species. greater understanding is expected. when you don't it's seen as odd.

it's possible that animals don't expect us to understnad everything as they're of another species and so they're fine that way.



faithfilly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 681
Location: New York State

23 Apr 2010, 9:28 am

You might find the book Animals in Translation by Temple Grandin interesting. It will give you a lot to think about. I'm the same way (always have been) about animals vs. people. I could write my own book on the subject of how communication with animals differs from with people, but I better not start here or else I won't stop.


_________________
"Has not my hand made all these things, and so they came into being?" declares the LORD. "This is the one I esteem: he who is humble and contrite in spirit, and trembles at my word." – Isaiah 66:2


ursaminor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Age: 160
Gender: Male
Posts: 936
Location: Leiden, Netherlands

23 Apr 2010, 10:49 am

No.
It is impossible to know what someone is feeling, either emotionally or physically.
I cannot even identify my own emotions, so it seems far fetched to assume I can sense others' emotions.



Aimless
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Apr 2009
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,187

23 Apr 2010, 11:55 am

faithfilly wrote:
You might find the book Animals in Translation by Temple Grandin interesting. It will give you a lot to think about. I'm the same way (always have been) about animals vs. people. I could write my own book on the subject of how communication with animals differs from with people, but I better not start here or else I won't stop.


I've read it and I enjoyed it very much.
Anyway, responses so far seem equally divided between that's a dumb question or that's an interesting one.
That's OK, I personally think animals convey significantly more than feed me, pet me. :)



Chronos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Apr 2010
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,698

23 Apr 2010, 11:57 am

Animals...or non-human animals rather, I believe are easier to read non-verbal cues from, because unlike humans, they have a much more limited set of wants, needs, and demands, and animals are always honest, while humans may have complex wants, needs, and sentients, and will convey an emotion or sentient at times, by superficially displaying the opposite of that emotion, need or sentient, for the sake of being "polite".

I think this is where most of the confusion comes in.



Aimless
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Apr 2009
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,187

23 Apr 2010, 12:07 pm

Chronos wrote:
Animals...or non-human animals rather, I believe are easier to read non-verbal cues from, because unlike humans, they have a much more limited set of wants, needs, and demands, and animals are always honest, while humans may have complex wants, needs, and sentients, and will convey an emotion or sentient at times, by superficially displaying the opposite of that emotion, need or sentient, for the sake of being "polite".

I think this is where most of the confusion comes in.


I think you're right. It's the honesty and the lack of confusing subtext.



wendigopsychosis
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 471
Location: United States

23 Apr 2010, 8:00 pm

I was just talking about this with my boyfriend earlier today!
I've always found that I can tell better what animals are feeling because their body language seems more logical to me. I can't describe it very well, but it seems that the movements and expressive movements of animals seem to make a lot more sense to me. I suppose that must be what it's like to read human emotions for a NT...


_________________
:heart: I'm an author and public speaker on autism, gender, and sexuality :heart:
:heart: Read my articles @ http://kirstenlindsmith.wordpress.com :heart:
:heart: Follow updates @ https://www.facebook.com/pages/Kirsten- ... 9135232493 :heart: