astaut wrote:
I feel like I identify with it, even though my family and diagnosticians say I'm very 'mild.' Before diagnosis I felt like I identified with being an aspie and they sort of said that I just decided that's what I wanted to be and I went looking for the diagnosis, even if it meant changing myself to fit it. But I don't think that's true in the least.
I got told that my doctor was a quack and I didn't have it and was just trying to change to conform to the diagnosis (and that asperger's didn't even exist, isn't a real thing.) But then I sat the person who was saying that down one day and started reading off a list of symptoms out of the blue without saying what they were, asking "do I do this?" with each one and except for one thing on the list of thirty they said yes I did do it, very much. *Then* I told them that it was a list of symptoms of asperger's syndrome. They still fought against it after that but very weakly. I think I made my point. Now, nine years later, they don't even bother to deny it or call it "alleged" or even say that asperger's doesn't exist. I think I opened their eyes enough that they started really seeing my patterns of behavior and realizing that I couldn't possibly fake something that consistently for that many years.
_________________
"In the end, we decide if we're remembered for what happened to us or for what we did with it."
-- Randy K. Milholland
Avatar=WWI propaganda poster promoting victory gardens.