Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 

Adamantus
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 468
Location: England

12 Nov 2010, 4:05 pm

Just realised sometime about email conversation to do with voice the person is using and how it is perceived. When someone says, "Are you talking to me?" it could mean are you actually referring to me, or it could mean "Are you talking to me?!" in an angry voice. I don't know why I didn't consider this before but until recently I think I was favouring the angry voice, god knows why. Anyway just thought I'd share in case this rings any bells or helps at all. In the past I had a strong tendency for the paranoia but it got much less as things went on.



richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351
Xfractor Card #351

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind

12 Nov 2010, 9:40 pm

exactly why i dont email anyone.

Usually, if i want to talk to someone i use a thing called are you ready? phone! :wink:


_________________
Winds of clarity. a universal understanding come and go, I've seen though the Darkness to understand the bounty of Light


billybud21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 666
Location: Indiana

12 Nov 2010, 9:46 pm

I would probably have assumed the worse case scenario too. However, I deal with so many emails on a daily basis, that I just quickly read and respond in a profession, yet brief manner. Frankly, I prefer to communicate via email, save me from the whole awkward conversation thing.


_________________
I don't have one.


Squirrelrat
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 448

12 Nov 2010, 9:53 pm

In a case like the one you described, I would reply with a simple "yes". If the other person was angry at me, the tone would probably be more apparent in his or her second response. Though even e-mail has its own complications, I still prefer it over regular speech. E-mail gives me the opportunity to carefully plan my response, whereas real-time speech does not.