DandelionFireworks wrote:
Yes, she has a point that it hurts the type of PR she wants to do. After all, if you call yourself autistic and succeed, you do make it harder to convince the world that all autistics are broken and defective and need a cure.
Actually, when I phrase it that way, that's what I'm trying to do.
Wait a minute. You mean to tell me you can't tell what he's crying about? You mean to tell me you can't tell? Have you tried making a note of what days it happens on, and all the stimuli that were around? Seriously, it should be pretty obvious.
It's obvious to me that he didn't want the camera there.
Have you tried sign language? PECS? Typing?
If you can't even deduce the immediate cause of such an upset because he can't talk to you (that sounds rather Aspie to me, not being able to read body language and requiring explicit verbal explanation), how can you know that he would rather be NT? Huh? It's much easier to deduce something like "camera = bad" (I did, though I don't know that it's the cause of the upset; he seemed upset about something else, and the camera was the icing on the already awful cake) than complicated philosophy. And what about nonverbal autistics who, when given some way to communicate, do communicate that they're proud of being who they are?
Also, he's six. I don't claim to have cried for days when I was six, but I do claim to have grown since then. I do hope no one tries to argue that, since I can do something today, I was never unable to. People grow. NTs grow. Autistics grow. Everyone else grows, too.
@Monique, not that this is my conversation, but I think she's responding to his last comment about using this theme-song for trolling furries. I thought that meant furries who were trolls, but Callista interpreted it differently.
@dyingofpoetry, I think Savage was quoted as an example of the sort of misunderstanding we're supposedly creating,
oh my mistake
_________________
i have change for the better.