That's a bit complicated. In the context of this forum, and other ASD communities, it generally refers to someone who does not have an ASD (autism spectrum disorder)
However, in the opinion of some, myself included, that's an overly narrow definition. An alternate, and IMO more accurate definition is that an NT is someone who does not fit the diagnostic criteria for any neurological difference or disorder. I don't think it's really accurate to define the following people as neurotypical:
-individuals with learning disabilities
-individuals with any subtype of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD),
-individuals with Sensory Processing Disorder that's not comorbid with ASD,
The same goes for individuals with any other neurological variations that results in a way of processing and utilizing information that does not fall within the range of typical human differences, particularly those that cause a clinically significant level of impairment.
Okay, I spent a long time working on this, trying to organize my thoughts and ideas into a more readable format, and I suspect that it still doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Neurological differences/ disorders and their impact on learning and functioning are something of an on again/ off again obsession of mine, and that obsession is very much on these days. Thus, I couldn't resist this opportunity to share my thoughts on the matter, welcome or otherwise.
Anyway, in this forum, the term NT is generally used to describe anyone who's not on the autism spectrum. That's all you really need to know to understand the term as typically used in posts here.
_________________
"And I find it kind of funny, I find it kind of sad./ The dreams in which I'm dying are the best I've ever had."
Last edited by OuterBoroughGirl on 29 Jan 2011, 6:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.