The other side of mild

Post Reply New Topic

Firstly, I'm not such a fan of terms like mild, severe, high functioning, low functioning. In a lot of ways, they don't work, and often, I don't use them.

So I'm trying to think of an acceptable way to ask my question.

Is there anyone around here who could be described by terms like "needs extensive support," "minimally independent," "challenging behaviors," "classic autism"...?

Unfortunately, when I was growing up, one had to be nonverbal or close to it and also very "low functioning" in day to day life to qualify for Asperger's Syndrome. The term "HFA" can be misleading because it assumes someone is high functioning, they should function in the every day world without support while "classic autism" assumes they will always need caretakers around the clock. Maybe the term Asperger's or HFA could be replaced by social learning disability or "social dyslexia" or something like that to specify where we need help? I am 35 and still living at home and underemployed but I have a real hard time qualifying for vocational rehab because I'm too "high functioning" so I love your point!

If you'd like to read more about my story growing up undiagnosed or learn about my personal insights, please view my website at
http://www.myaspergerslifestory.com/

Allie Kat

I feel those who think 'High Functioning' means 'mild' have no real comprehension of how seriously debilitating our impaired Executive Function is. I may speak articulately, and I can (sort of) manage a checking account, but I would absolutely have a panic attack if I tried to buy a house or a car without support from someone I trusted to understand all the fine print and the legalese. Actually, I wouldn't try - I'd have a panic attack just thinking about it and never leave the house.

That is exactly why those labels make no sense to me. Because in order to get a diagnosis at all, you have to be significantly impaired by it. And if you are impaired, how is that high-functioning or mild? It makes no sense.

It's a mild form of a severe condition, I guess. That's how.

I think the OP was hoping that this would not turn into a discussion of semantics. The labels that are used to try to describe how well or poorly an individual is able to function are necessarily flawed. Perhaps each person's case could be best described as a graph that represents the severity of each symptom. But for lack of better words, I consider my AS to be mild.

I don't get it, why do I qualify for the service but yet I am mild but some other aspies don't qualify?

Either it's the area I am in or the problems I have like how much help I needed in school so they figured it will have impact on how I function in life.