Random topic change thread

Post Reply New Topic

Because the people here either tend either to discuss any kind of stuff in nearly every thread beside of the initial problem that a thread was created for it's time for creating the ultimate random topic thread now.
May be that we should start talking the problem why the people here are quite unable to keep talking about the initial topic instead of discussing any kind of random other stuff that just enters their mind in nearly every thread here.

I think it's just something that's the result of the way that the hyperconnected brain of many people on the spectrum works. If there are things related to a theme who seem to be a little bit more important or just more interesting then the initial problem then they start to discuss those thing instead of the initial topic.
For me the interesting thing is not the question of how to keep talk about the initial problem. The interesting thing to me is rather the way that the brain of the people on the spectrum works. I think it's a strength and a weekness of many of us at the same time.
If it comes to me it's nearly impossible to me to keep a focus on unimportant things as long as I have to care about much more important and more interesting things at the same time.

PS: You may be really autistic once you have a thread on your own at WP that nobody cares but you.

But at least I have no problems discussing strange things with my self in public in a language that I'm not really good at.

But a little bit of self-confidence once there are other people around has also sometimes advantages of course.
If thare are NTs around who don't have a real plan what to do then it may cause them to make you their leader and to follow your instructions. Best example for this is the election of the new British prime minister.

Last edited by quite an extreme on 27 Jul 2019, 9:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

????? Is this about X is X topic, but someone said X is somewhat Y and so is Z. Then someone said X had some A and B with HIJKL, then bits of some derailed the thing to talking about Ys and Zs, then more bits end up discussing about X has A and B instead of X is X, and then it goes all around from there??


Ahm.. If I do have any more direct reply here it was this:

I had reread the OP few times over the course of hours in hopes of viewing it in some sort of way by various states, but uhhhhhhh...
Either something written here is vaguely unclear and it's just that. Or that the writing is right it's just me who didn't understood it so I'd just wait for someone who may able to grasp the words better.

As someone with crappier verbal IQ and with a probably more scattered hyperconnection, I'd highly likely wager it's the latter.

That's a point. May be I'm relying to much on the German grammar. This may be as hard to understand for English speaking people as the thinking of NTs is for autistic people. The German grammar relys on more mental registers and allows nested sentences of a less strict word order. For this it's a little bit more difficult to understand. It could be hard to get the meaning of my sentences if you aren't used to it.

.. I don't wanna discuss how Tagalog grammar differs from English. Too many stuff couldn't be explained.
Still, I'm better at receiving with English.


Though my case is really more to do with receptive and expressive language issues than native language gap.
Along with less linear like thinking, and it doesn't exactly help with the verbal medium being a less reliable for me to have to mentally convert it into 'terms' I could understand.

On top of blurting out stuff that seem to relate my experiences and observations more than the topic's whole focus -- but this is more about human limitation issue part, because it's mainly what, if not the only one or all that a person knows.

And not to mention how certain explanations seem that are also taken in different contexts that I had to reword the parts or the whole thing again and see if those arrangement can come across the point that I was trying to point out without making it seem that it turned into some argument -- now, this is more like a language issue part.
While gauging if it those who responded had got it or not, while rethinking if what is written made sense to another person to begin with.
And, on top of being inconsistent with how I reread my own and other else's words and phrases. Day before, I see X, day after it's not X, it's A, day right after it's neither, etc.

Perhaps this is just one of my less cautious state of self that made me replied in the first place. Any sooner or later, I may read it differently or same, yet may or may not bother replying, may or may not post at the same manner.

The second 'either' was wrong. I'll try to express it a bit simpler. The people here are talking about stuff that isn't related to the initial topic in nearly all of the threads. For this I created this thread where it's OK to change the topic of the discussion at any time.

All I know is you're quite a random guy saying random things in random places Extreme. Way to be random

If I would be the well known guy who says well known things at well known places than it wouldn't be worth the time of any others here to have even a random look at it.
For this seems to be random the less boring way to go. If you fancy posts of boring or suffering people then you shouldn't read my posts. I'm not the one who is into this and I hope I never will.