jmnixon95 wrote:
Wouldn't "mental retardation", even mild, be a "clinically significant delay in cognitive development"?
It would have to be significant enough to be diagnosed, surely.
At first glance, I thought so too.
Quote:
There is no clinically significant delay in cognitive development [...] in childhood.
So within the first 3 years of life ("childhood"), a child with AS should still be more or less "normal". I wish it was more descriptive than that. Ah yes, for some reason, those with AS are allowed to show clinically significant impairments in those areas after age 3.
That criterion is problematic because "no clinically significant delay" can mean different things. "Normal" development can include language delays, cognitive delays, delayed self-help skills and adaptive behaviours as well as overall "abnormal" behaviours. Thus, some cases of borderline cognitive functioning and mild MR aren't recognised as such at ages 0-3 or even ages 0-6.
(A kid who starts saying single words at age 23 months sure is delayed compared to that the average age of saying single words is said to be age 12/13 months. Still, starting to say single words at 23 months is perfectly fine for AS whereas starting to say single words at age 25 months is not.)
It's not too long ago I worked with a kid with AS who wasn't detected to have very mild MR until age 8. There had been testing for other childhood disorders when she was age 4 1/2 (if I recall that correctly) but the MR wasn't detected as such. Mild MR isn't always a clear-cut thing so there are child who hit their milestones within the first 3 years of life really "late" but "on time" but still get diagnosed with a cognitive delay later.
_________________
Autism + ADHD
______
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. Terry Pratchett