I think that's a great analogy. I found it really interesting considering my main special interest -is- music.
But that actually makes things a lot like your analogy, for me. Not as bad as it is in your analogy, but still - I have some very specific special interest areas within music, such as jazz (which in itself is a whole set of genres) - and these days most people I run into do not like jazz. They don't hear the beauty in it. To me it has SO MUCH MORE to it than most modern music - especially pop. But the musically challenged prefer hearing music that is very predictable, which is why most pop music follows the same few chord progressions, or variants on them, although many of the musically challenged seem surprised when I point out and demonstrate how so many songs they like follow the same progression. Every now and then there's a gleaming diamond in the rough in modern music, but for the most part it's just boring to my ears - the equivalent of food that tastes like cardboard - no flavor - at the same time not making you want to violently vomit, but also not what you're going to go to when you want a snack.
There's also no improvisation, no dynamics, no variety, and most of the pop singers can't sing worth anything - they simply exist because of autotune. Just listen to them live - they usually suck (like not being able to sing in tune) or are lip syncing.
But so many do not see the beauty I see in jazz, not to mention many other musical genres.
Another common one (my sister is guilty of this) is that many people don't like instrumental music, simply because there's no singing in it... I just don't get it.