ArtGeek wrote:
It seems like an odd thing to say. Vaguely scripted, like "take what the person says and turn it into a question" sort of thing. I don't know that I'd be offended so much as as amused and perhaps concerned the individual wasn't too bright/well-suited for their position. I don't think you were wrong in thinking it was off. How did the group respond?
Exactly. And I would also like to know what the group responded with.
I like to always take out the word "autism" and put in "blackness" and then see how the sentence sounds.
"Have you ever interacted with someone with blackness?" WHAT?
I think you should bring it back up the next time you guys meet. You could say that you were taken aback at that and couldn't properly respond at the time and now that you've had the time to think about it, you're alarmed at the question.
Roughly 1.5% of the population is estimated to be autistic. About the same amount of people who have naturally red hair and who are gay or lesbian. You can sit and imagine how many red-haired people you know, including those with "kind of red" hair, and that is how many autistic people you know, including "kind of" autistic people. That is also how many gay/lesbian people you know. The difference is that there is much less of a stigma attached to red hair than there is to homosexuality or to autism, so those kinds of people may not TELL you these personal things about themselves and in fact may go through a lot of trouble to fool you into thinking that they are NOT autistic, gay, or a lesbian.
So yes, you should have been offended. I am as well.