AQ-10, a quick test to check if you should get checked out

Page 1 of 3 [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Blownmind
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Feb 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 825
Location: Norway

10 Jul 2012, 3:26 am

AQ-10, a quick referral guide for adults with suspected autism who do not have a learning disability.
http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG142/AQ10Test/pdf/English (updated 27th of June, 2012)

There are all these tests you can take to check if its likely you are autistic or not, this test however only checks to see if you should go get assessed. Only 10 questions, if you get 6 or more points, you should consider getting a diagnostic assessment at a specialist.

Disclaimer; I havn't seen this test before, I do not know if it is new or not.


_________________
AQ: 42/50 || SQ: 32/80 || IQ(RPM): 138 || IRI-empathytest(PT/EC/FS/PD): 10(-7)/16(-3)/19(+3)/19(+10) || Alexithymia: 148/185 || Aspie-quiz: AS 133/200, NT 56/200


Dillogic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,339

10 Jul 2012, 3:31 am

Seems to be the most important questions from the AQ test (50 in that one. 10 in this one); it's from the same people.

Reasonably accurate for what it's intended.



Raziel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,616
Location: Europe

10 Jul 2012, 3:52 am

Nice idea, but I like the longer version better.

If on the short version thinks about him/herself different in 2-3 questions then the chance is much higher that they are accidently "positive" or "negative".


_________________
"I'm astounded by people who want to 'know' the universe when it's hard enough to find your way around Chinatown." - Woody Allen


Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

10 Jul 2012, 4:09 am

Sometimes you can trim down a longer test to make it shorter, without decreasing its effectiveness very much.

For example: On a hypothetical test, 95% of the people who answer "Yes" to question 10 also answer "Yes" to question 30 and "No" to question 41. You could have only a very small drop in effectiveness if you combined those three questions into one or dropped all but one of them. Redundant questions of this sort can be used to test whether the person is paying attention to the test enough to answer consistently, but if you want a shorter test, they can be taken out without too much damage.


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


SilkySifaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Apr 2012
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,396
Location: UK

10 Jul 2012, 4:55 am

I got 10 out of 10, I don't think I've ever done that well on a test before :)



Blownmind
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Feb 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 825
Location: Norway

10 Jul 2012, 5:12 am

Callista wrote:
Sometimes you can trim down a longer test to make it shorter, without decreasing its effectiveness very much.

True, and in addition there might be questions in the long tests created to take the focus of the actual purpose of the test, to avoid the testee to answer according to what he think will give him the result he desire (the EQ test contains ~10% questions of that kind, questions that actually won't affect the score at all).

I got 42/50 on the AQ test, while I got 8/10 (the same as 40/50) on the AQ-10 test. :)


_________________
AQ: 42/50 || SQ: 32/80 || IQ(RPM): 138 || IRI-empathytest(PT/EC/FS/PD): 10(-7)/16(-3)/19(+3)/19(+10) || Alexithymia: 148/185 || Aspie-quiz: AS 133/200, NT 56/200


Last edited by Blownmind on 10 Jul 2012, 5:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

coolies
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 23 May 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 197

10 Jul 2012, 5:28 am

SilkySifaka wrote:
I got 10 out of 10, I don't think I've ever done that well on a test before :)


Agreed :D



Raziel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,616
Location: Europe

10 Jul 2012, 5:53 am

I don't trust tests too much in generall.
They should just be used as a screening instrument, but in reallity that's not the purpose most of the time.

When I was younger I didn't noticed that my social understanding is just not the same as this of other people. When I was asked, I answered that my socials and emotional understanding are good. I just came out that this was not the case when I was tested in those areas.

I don't like it too much when psychiatrists are thinking to find out the correct diagnoses when asking 2-3 questions and nearly good wrongly diagnosed because of that in the past, because they didn't saw the "big picture", the reasons for my behavior, they were too fixated on 2-3 questions and that's all.
Afterwards I explained myself and my reasons so that I got the correct diagnoses. But still that scared me.


_________________
"I'm astounded by people who want to 'know' the universe when it's hard enough to find your way around Chinatown." - Woody Allen


hanyo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,302

10 Jul 2012, 6:12 am

I got 9. The only one I didn't get a point for was this. I'm not sure I understand it but I don't think I do it.

"I like to collect information about categories of things (e.g. types of car, types of bird, types of train, types of plant etc)"



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

10 Jul 2012, 7:05 am

Hmm, 10/10.



Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

10 Jul 2012, 7:52 am

10/10, when do I collect my prize?


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


johnsmcjohn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,279
Location: Las Vegas

10 Jul 2012, 10:52 am

Took the AQ before. Roughly the same results this time. Glad to see I haven't changed.

Edit: 9/10 in case anyone cares.


_________________
Your Aspie score: 181 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 30 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie
Myers-Briggs: INTJ
AQ: 44


Last edited by johnsmcjohn on 11 Jul 2012, 1:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

10 Jul 2012, 10:55 am

Who_Am_I wrote:
10/10, when do I collect my prize?


Your official Aspie toaster in the form of a train will arrive shortly.



anomy
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 22 May 2012
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 96

10 Jul 2012, 11:06 am

Some of those questions could definitely be answered with "it depends"

Not a fan of this particular test.



Tuttle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,088
Location: Massachusetts

10 Jul 2012, 11:11 am

Verdandi wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
10/10, when do I collect my prize?


Your official Aspie toaster in the form of a train will arrive shortly.


Can mine be a cat instead? I like cats better than trains.



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

10 Jul 2012, 11:14 am

Tuttle wrote:
Verdandi wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
10/10, when do I collect my prize?


Your official Aspie toaster in the form of a train will arrive shortly.


Can mine be a cat instead? I like cats better than trains.


A cat in the shape of a toaster or a toaster in the shape of a cat?