Exaggerated Emotional Expression

Post Reply New Topic

I've noticed something. I can pick up emotional cues intuitively just fine, but only if attention is being drawn towards them and they are exaggerated, like in a cartoon. In real life no attention is being drawn to them, thus they are missed, and they are a lot subtler, so they are harder to differentiate. Is this the same for anyone else, and if so, what are the ramifications for this?

I sometimes pick up on emotional cues and sometimes not. Maybe the ones I pick up on are less subtle. I learn a lot about communication watching television. Movies that are character studies and documentaries may be helpful to study. I think actors exaggerate to a small amount and when there are close-ups of the person's face as they realize something in character studies can be helpful. I notice people's faces in documentaries sometimes turn a little red when they are emotional and if it is a negative emotion (anger or they border on crying) their face seems to almost swell with fluids. I guess I'm saying it might help if studied.

It is the same for me. In normal conversations I don't pick up on expressions much, but if it is pointed out and exaggerated I do understand it, even though since my understanding is so "specific" I don't think it's that intuitive. I understand voice intonation better.
It's also easier in movies than in conversations, because I don't have to concentrate on formulating my response so I can pay more attention to faces.

In real life, social-emotional cues are considered by my brain to be irrelevant stimuli. The physical features of the face and body, those I attend to sometimes. The rest, it's like it doesn't eggsist.