Sethno wrote:
I was talking in PM with someone here, and after being told the new "rules" on who is and isn't autistic ("Level 1", "Level 2", "Level 3") had to ask-
"If even level one says the person needs 'support' and even with that 'support' still has serious problems interacting and such... Where does that leave high funtioning people? Will people like Temple Grandin, John Robison, or even Alex Plank still be able to say 'I'm autistic', or will they no longer meet the 'requirements'?"
Seems that question remains unanswered, but if the person functions without 'support', how could they even fit into the "Level 1" description?
And if not there, then what does the person say about themself? I mean, they still have some "quirks" as far as the NT world goes.
They certainly can't be described as neuro-typical, because they DO have aspects of autism to their thinking and personalities.
So where does that leave them?
Back to being called "weirdo"?
What about youngsters in that situation? Kids who last year would have plainly been identified as on the spectrum, now they'll never be described as "autistic"? If so, then what WILL they be called?
That's going to be the issue that smashes the new standards. APA is adopted by the courts and lawmakers because of convience, that can be changed with a vote or a court ruling.
_________________
Our first challenge is to create an entire economic infrastructure, from top to bottom, out of whole cloth.
-CEO Nwabudike Morgan, "The Centauri Monopoly"
Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri (Firaxis Games)