Could my IQ score be legitimately 138?

Page 1 of 1 [ 11 posts ] 

NateRiver
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 8 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 238

20 Apr 2013, 6:57 am

When I was 5 years old I took a DAP test and scored a mental cognitive ability of 6 years and 9 months. I heard you can calculate your IQ by Chronological age/ mental age *100 so would that make my IQ 138 or an estimate of it?



briankelley
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb 2012
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 666
Location: STENDEC

20 Apr 2013, 7:07 am

Wouldn't the mental age variable have to remain a constant to make such a calculation? A lot of times people with a high intellect who have autism do poorly on IQ tests because they seem to be based more on measuring perception rather than raw intellect. Having perceptual problems was part of my childhood diagnosis. I think I did poorly on standardized IQ tests because of it. I took an online IQ test for fun once. It said I was a 122.



oceandrop
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 398

20 Apr 2013, 7:28 am

IQ isn't calculated that way anymore. Also IQ changes so your score today won't be related to your score at age 5.



mrspotatohead
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 4 Apr 2012
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 307

20 Apr 2013, 7:42 am

the MENSA mini-IQ, or "Workout," test says I may have an IQ of around 140. My husband took it, and he got around 120.
I was never given any standardized IQ tests... the closest thing I got to that were the regular seventh grade subject tests that showed that I was above average in all subjects and above the 12th grade level in reading and writing.



Cafeaulait
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,539
Location: Europe

20 Apr 2013, 8:27 am

Who cares? But age to do an IQ test is not 5 but 7.5



Ettina
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,971

20 Apr 2013, 8:55 am

Quote:
Also IQ changes so your score today won't be related to your score at age 5.


Of course it'll be related. It's not exactly the same, but there is a significant correlation between IQ scores at different ages.



xMistrox
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2013
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 255

20 Apr 2013, 11:20 am

The standing belief is that your IQ doesn't change much over time, but there is the idea of "neuro-plasticity" where one can supposedly reorganize the brain to gain a higher IQ and reasoning ability through practice. Personally I think both can be true. IQ won't get you much by having it measured unless you need it to enter some sort of society/job/activity where it is a requirement. MENSA takes IQ scores from some tests no matter the age when you took it as long as it qualifies (I don't see DAP listed on their site). The only good that might do you is finding people with similar interests and knowledge to share, and the various discounts you get from being a member.

I took the online test on emode/tickle/testq (the site has changed names/owners over the years) which gave me a 146, while my step-mother who is a registered nurse received a 126 and my then girlfriend received a 104. I was in gifted and talented at school off and on, but I don't know if 146 would be accurate, but the scores for my step-mother and girlfriend seemed fairly close. I might try to take an official one sometime for fun.


_________________
BAP: 103 aloof / 100 rigid / 103 pragmatic
AQ: 40 EQ: 8 SQ: 114
Aspie: AS-156/200 NT-56/200
RAADS-R: 189 total
Diagnosed 9/2013


Highlander852456
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 1 Apr 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 301
Location: Bratislava

20 Apr 2013, 12:01 pm

Best to take new test. If you score lower it is ok. Some people do have lower scores with advance age. The score can be with in the range of 10-/10+ points.



Tyri0n
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)

20 Apr 2013, 3:07 pm

The Weschler IQ test tends to give lower scores to individuals with Asperger's because it requires a lot of manual tasks and sensory integration (hitting at the core of dyspraxia) while the Raven Matrices test tends to give higher scores to individuals with Asperger's. (I saw a study on this but am too lazy to dig it up).

The test given to children in school is often similar to the Raven test while, typically, the official test administered to adults in a clinical setting is typically the Weschler test. This is why it may appear as if IQ scores decline with age while, in reality, it may just be a different test.

This is why many individuals diagnosed with Asperger's as adults often show up as having barely average IQ's but were in the gifted programs in school.



AinsleyHarte
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 181
Location: Seattle-ish.

20 Apr 2013, 3:28 pm

Tyri0n wrote:
This is why many individuals diagnosed with Asperger's as adults often show up as having barely average IQ's but were in the gifted programs in school.


This makes sense.
When I was in elementary school, my IQ score was 180 and I was considered gifted. I can't remember exactly what it was the last time I took a test (some years ago,) but it was definitely not that high - maybe around 130-140.


_________________
I wish I knew who I was before I was Me.

Aspie score: 180 / 200 - NT score: 25 / 200
Aloof: 112 / Rigid: 109 / Pragmatic: 117
AQ: 47


Anomiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,023

20 Apr 2013, 4:05 pm

Tyri0n wrote:
This is why it may appear as if IQ scores decline with age while, in reality, it may just be a different test.



Yes. But they adjust for peergroup/age too, most common with children's scores. Meaning a precocious aspie-kid will score much higher than their peers. The sinking number for many with age doesn't indicate the actual IQ-number getting lower. That's different from country to country. I remember when I was 11 and the testgiver said I was at the level of someone that was 18 (if I remember correctly). I haven't really thought about it until now, didn't know that formula or even that it had any significance. Have no real idea what my IQ is really as I have the same uneven profile that many other autistics have and I think it's more important how you use what you got anyway.

http://hr.psychtests.com/archprofile/apops/iq_glossary.html wrote:
Explanation of Scoring: Why 3 scores?

For decades, adjustement of IQ scores for age and gender has been a highly debated topic in psychological testing. There are many good arguments on each side of the debate. We leave the choice up to you - read the explanations below and decide which score makes the most sense in your situation.

Raw IQ score
This IQ score incorporates the population norms regardless of age and gender. It means that the same answers would result in the same score for a 15-year-old girl as a 75-year old man.

IQ score adjusted for age
This IQ score incorporates the population norms for the test-taker's age group regardless of gender. This means that with the same answers to the test questions, someone who is 75 would get a higher score than someone who is 35. Women and men of the same age would get the same score.

IQ score adjusted for age and gender
This IQ score incorporates the population norms for both the test-taker's age group and gender. This means that with the same answers to the test questions, a 75-year-old woman would get a different score from a 75-year-old man, and she would score higher than her younger counterpart. The reason for this adjustment is to compensate for certain factors that put specific age or gender groups at a disadvantage. For instance, a teen who is actively solving arithmetic problems at school will answer such items with more ease than someone who has been out of school for 30 years.