I was just going to write that I hope this doesn't result in recommendations that neuroleptics be used to 'treat' ASD's (as they seem to be standard procedure for SZ (despite evidence showing they may actually harm long-term recovery)). But then I thought that was a little too paranoid. Then, I read the abstract, and at the end it says this:
Quote:
► Autism and schizophrenia have therapeutic targets in common.
Now, that could mean all kinds of things. It could be behavioral stuff, I suppose. But it sure makes me think of drugs, specifically neuroleptics, which I see increasingly prescribed for non-SZ purposes (and not that they're even great for that). That class of drugs, even beyond the Parkinsonism, tardive dyskinsia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, have a pretty dark and dubious history. Meaning: corruption, of science and the medical establishment. (I recommend "Mad in America," by Robert Whitaker for a good history about neuroleptics.)
I wonder if it is possible to find out if pharmaceutical company money was involving in the funding of this research?