Thousands of books later, the answer is yes. Wikipedia and WP are the best of the Internet.
The root of the knowledge problem is in, Consilence, the convergance of all knowledge, by a Harvard Entomoligst. Doctor of Natural Philosphy was the highest Degree, it covered everything, and was pure AS, you got real good at what interested you, and got the Degree. Natural learners were the mainstream.
Then came the idea of chopping it up, the sum of human knowledge has been sliced and diced, Geology used to include fossils, soil science, and botany. It was split, and moved apart, so now the knowledge of the decay of rock, formation of soil, and how plants adapt, takes learning in three or more fields.
The idea was more researchers in narrow fields would probe deeper. It proved lopsided, no two progressed together, and no one had the time to read outside of their field. Even if you hire four specialists none of them will speak words with the same meaning as you or the others. They have evolved.
If you wish to know the chemical reactions in soil, how that relates to a hundred tons per acre of invisable life in the top soil, and how that in turn reacts with plants, and how that affects what eats the plants, you have to go to school for a hundred years. Government by the rich, and Universities founded by religious groups, had their reasons.
The last forty years have seen some change. Hypen Science, Bio-Chem, and others, are new bridges, but narrow, between fields created like countries in Africa carved out by European powers without regard for tribes, language, or natural borders.
A Generalist can have dual Doctorates, Bass Fishing and Vollyball, and be unable to replace a blown fuse, or in the path of the people who created the modern era, no papers, no formal education, yet make a great leap forward in knowledge, by looking at the facts. The second is generally frowned on, but they get most of the important Patents. I have more University Credits than Bill Gates.
Most things I have ask me questions. I go from not knowing, to knowing what there is quickly. When I master a subject I discover how shallow it is. This leads to more questions, more study, till I burn out the thread. Then I quit and do something else.
Memory is, I seem unable to forget. I keep running across common images in various fields, the Economy of Nature, snipets of code, the same in divergant fields. Now I scan new things for patterns before going to Wikipedia, and all the books on the subject.
I do associate knowledge with places, maps, every pattern in my head. I do not believe anything, it is just a puzzle part, until it connects with my base knowledge of proven facts, then it snaps into place, and my sorting continues.
Most things are simple, then complex, then simple again, then complex. Facts are not knowledge, knowledge not understanding, and understanding is not wisdom, only the beginning.
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but a fool who persists in his folly soon becomes wise.