kraftiekortie wrote:
For me, not obtaining a diagnosis is an economic decision. Here in the US, it could cost thousands to see the person required to get the diagnosis. It just ain't worth the bucks.
It serves no purpose for me in the "real world."
Tough nuggies if some autism activist or whatever require a diagnosis for me to be credible.
Well said!
For people of my age and situation in the UK, it's not uncommon to wait 5-10 years to be assessed. And as you say, the expense is potentially a big factor.
Baron-Cohen, the top bod in the UK Asperger's Industry, recently went on record as saying he wouldn't give a diagnosis to someone, even if he "knew" they had it, unless it was "necessary". By this, one must assume he means necessary for the purpose of getting access to therapy, medication or some kind of state benefit, none of which is relevant to my case (though some might dispute the "therapy" bit!).
I have most of the social-interactional, attitudinal, behavioural and sensory issues pertaining to Asperger's, and I don't really need any "expert" to give me a certificate stating the obvious.
I also got pretty steamed up about the recent thread pertaining to "pseudo aspies", though I could see where the OP was coming from!