skibum wrote:
Well, there are plenty of people diagnosed as children who are not that affected by it by the time they are adults and would no long meet the criteria. Yes, some level of impairment would still exist, but not necessarily enough to be considered a disability. They would still be autistic nonetheless.
Yeah. I see what you mean. Especially with all the classes and things like that that are available to them nowadays that can certainly happen. So in that regard, you would be right. I had not thought of that.[/quote]
This is very true. As it now stands my psychiatrist believes I no longer display enough of the social elements of AS as compared to what I used to display, while I still have things like the chaotic environment and issues with learning and concentration. I would say that socially, I no longer meet the criteria. I was diagnosed as a child however and in some ways I am still impaired, though concentration issues may also be attributed to another diagnosis. Perhaps those who fail to meet
all the criteria as an adult, still fall under certain
other criteria when they are adult. I can hardly believe a child diagnosed with autism would suddenly be 100% normal and in no way impaired. There will always be elements remaining, and reaction speed may still be slower, learning may still be a little more difficult then average. The issues have shifted insofar that they now fall within what is considered the
average range for NT.